Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 267 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Are All 320 kbps MP3s Created Equal? #11143
    softcore
    Member

    VinnyBlanc, post: 11136 wrote:
    If I had a 128kbps track and re-encoded it to 320kbps I am not gaining any additional quality (just increasing the file size? I believe)

    Correct!

    PS: I also edited my initial reply because I may have been reading Spandryl’s post the wrong way!

    in reply to: Are All 320 kbps MP3s Created Equal? #11135
    softcore
    Member

    I don’t really understand how you could gain quality from a 128kbps or 192kbps mp3 when re-encoding it to 320kbps. The “information” is already lost and cannot be re-obtained. In fact, these “fake” 320kpbs (re-encoded out of lower kbps) are th emain reason many tracks found on the net, supposedly at 320kbps are not really sounding as such.

    edit: unless I misunderstood the meaning of your posting, I read it as if you are stating that you re-encode mp3s to gain quality – if you just state that a 320kbps of unknown source could be a re-encoded 128/192 mp3 hence it sounds bad, then I agree 100%

    Now, to answer the OP, the dual stereo format is the higher quality of stereo seperation you can get – always go for that. Joint stereo provides smaller file size but compromises the stereo seperation of the sound. The difference is mainly audible in quality speakers/monitors but not so much in clubs where the “stereo image” is neglected by the design of the club in the first place.

    Another thing that supposedly could provide different results of a wave file when encoded to 320 kbps mp3 is the algorithm used – the most famous ones being “lame mp3 encoder” and “Fraunhofer mp3 encoder”. frankly, I have tested both and I wasnt able to detect noticeable differences in the final result (at least audibly). I never bothered to “null test” the resulted mp3s to see if there are any differences.

    in reply to: What are you Guys Reading (magazines/blogs/sites/etc) #1002347
    softcore
    Member

    Rattfink, post: 11049 wrote: yah I was wondering which one to choose from either computermusic or futuremusic- what’s the main difference there?

    I think they come from the same publishing house, so in essence they pretty much cover the same stuff, I believe though Computer Music is a tad more software-centric. In all honesty however if you happen to buy both for a long period of time, you will notice that they seem to “collapse” – exchange topics. I used to buy both, then ended up buying only CM due to trying to minimise my expenses (Greece anyone? lol)

    in reply to: How to star producing music? #11048
    softcore
    Member

    I can only say go for it. It used to be a dream for me, whn I started, or actually it wasnt even one of my wildest dreams, and when it happened it felt totally natural and not really a big deal. 😉 I can tell you though the best feeling is when you play your track in your gig and you see the crowd go wild – thats the best feeling of the world.

    softcore
    Member

    I started music production with software and only software (when it wasnt actually the mainstream thing to do) so i figured my name could reflect that so I used “Softcore”…..Also thought it was a cunning idea to use a word which is usually used to specify the soft categories of….ahem…ermmmm…..porn. I was wrong on that part judging by the fact that :
    1. daily traffic on my website shows me that too many people on this planet like softcore porn and not electronic music (lol)
    2.some social websites (Facebook anyone?) have words forbidden to be used as names for pages.

    Oh well, too late for that now…..I think I have posted on this forum again this joke..but here goes…I always laugh thinking I should name one of my future releases “Softcore – Audio Porn EP” lol

    in reply to: How to star producing music? #1002341
    softcore
    Member

    +1 on the “the dance music manual” by rick snoman.

    Generally, read, read, read, read, ….lol…. The more you study, and the more you become familair with terminology, the more sense the manual of Ableton Live (or any other DAW) will make. I dunno why but sometimes I get the idea people seem to think that learning to make music is simply learning a program- if you think so, this is not the case…I’d say dont actually bother learniing a music making program for a couple of months, just find books to read that will make you familiar with terminology and the ermmmm technical aspects of music. You see, I have realised that DJs even though they have a great skill of “listening” to music, they usually have huge problems to translate what they are listening, (and what their brain is listening) to production-wise meaningful notions. “I want my sound to be beefier, deeper, warmer” mean almost nothing in the world of a producer – its all frequencies and dynamics, balances and levels, tricks and techniques. Sometimes Djs in my area starting to produce ask me to give them tips to make their sound “this” or “that” and I honestly – even though I try – I dont have the slightest clue what they mean because they are speaking from the listener standpoint. There was this guy who was asking me how to make his synth sound dirtier and I was thinking like “distortion” and the only thing he wanted was a 8 – 10 khz low pass filter to roll off higher frequencies.

    So my best advice would be, try and learn to translate sounds into meaningful, scientfic terms. What is causing that effect to be so spacey? perhaps the fact that it moves from left to right? What is causing that bass to be so dirty? perhaps that fact that it has also high frequencies in it? Sooner or later, and by studying and practising you ‘ll catch yourself listening to music from a whole other standpoint, seperating the instruments subcnsciously, actually listening how the track was made. After this point, its all a matter of using the tools provided by DAWs to “imitate” behaviours of sound.

    From personal experience, the beauty of making music is that its endless…you can never honestly say to yourself you mastered it. Upo finishing a tune, you think so, then you go back and listen to it 2 months later and you are like “what the hell was I thinking? the mistakes are obvious, NOW I ‘ve mastered it” and it goes on like that in cycles (no Im not joking, seriously).
    In all honesty, I got like 10 releases on Beatport and I still think Im just learning music production.

    The truth is, being an electronic music producer means you pretty much have to master various skills which in other genres would be required from different people….I mean you have to, first and foremost be a composer (the easy part really cause dance music is pretty simple in structure and melodies), a performer OR DAW user (either you perform with your midi keyboard or you work your way through the editing features of your DAW, sometimes you do a bit of both), an arranger/orchestrator (you got this musical idea, but what kind of instrument will you use for it, will it be an organic sounding piano or a whacked out dirty synth sound), a mixing engineer (levels of sounds, balancing, etc) and finally a producer (with the traditional meaning of the word) , not to mention that in 99% of cases as a beginner you will also have to do the mastering of your track (unless you are willing to pay a masterign engineer to do it).

    The faster you realise these different aspects, the easier for you it will become to focus on each of them and learn to know which one is “bugging” you in your first attempts of writing music. Like, you had this idea, and you dabbled with your software but the result is dissapointing. Why? Is the melody poor? Or is it brilliant but played on the wronf instrument? or is it the correct instrument but the arrangement in the track chokes it? And 1000002290830123 other things.

    Dont be intimitated however, I can honestly say making music is a VERY rewarding process….take it one step at a time and enjoy the ride…I can guarantee you ‘ll never grow out of it, just because its so deep and never ending…there is always more to discover! 😉

    in reply to: What are you Guys Reading (magazines/blogs/sites/etc) #11042
    softcore
    Member

    I have been an avid reader and fan of Computer Music – the UK edition. You might wanna check it out and subscribe to that instead of Future Music. 😉

    in reply to: Top 5 producers/artist #11040
    softcore
    Member
    in reply to: 5 Tips For DJing With Just A Laptop #10801
    softcore
    Member

    I usually DJ with a BCR 2000 as my basic controller…..Last night, minutes before a gig my controller’s USB Midi failed….Key mappings and an external mixer saved me from total humiliation. So, even if you dont condone mixing only with a laptop (I honestly do not), I learnt from experience it is sometimes a perfect fall-back plan.

    in reply to: Behringer UCA202 #10742
    softcore
    Member

    +1 for the NI 2.

    in reply to: Super Cheap Soundcards? #10741
    softcore
    Member

    Also note that its not possible with ASIO drivers top use multiple soundcards in a program – when using ASIO you are bound to using only one soundcard.

    in reply to: Why use a "traditional" controller? #10740
    softcore
    Member

    As for the “connect somehow” part, I think you ll be delighted to know you can midi-sync Traktor with Live so that they both play on the same downbeat and BPM. Use a virtual midi cable (like Yoke) and you are done.

    in reply to: Professional Dj's playing prerecorded mixes. Opinion? #10739
    softcore
    Member

    If they can’t handle mixing live every show, then I think they’re in the wrong business

    Pretty much this sums up my opinion – occasions like D-Jam mentioned I can accept, but nothing more than that….In fact if I notice such a thing hapening ( IF ) , I’ll turn 180 degrees (assuming the door is facing the booth) and walk away as fast as I can.

    in reply to: How did you become a DJ? #10519
    softcore
    Member

    Yes of course, I was just stating a strictly personal taste over there! 😉

    in reply to: How did you become a DJ? #10517
    softcore
    Member

    I adored music – I still do. At first I wasnt into electronic music that much. In the 90ies I went to this “rave party” – it was around the era when Digweed and Sasha were doing (what I personally think) the best gigs of their lifetime and that was it, I was hooked to electronic music – the dark, deep, underground 4 on the floor type of it, that is – I think it was around 1996 or so. Trance was already popular but frankly, it was the genre of electronic music that was making me puke whenever I was hearing people talk about electronic music – it always sounded to me fake, plastic, game music. But those guys, Digweed and Sasha were playing something different, deep bassy kicks, basic percusive patterns, simplistic and driving, dark and trippy, no belss no whistles, no silly apreggios – what I consider now to be the first minimal techno sounds I had ever heard – at the time of course, there wasnt such a term at least here in Greece. People were calling it “progressive house” but it wasnt that either.
    At the same time, being a guy who is into music and all that stuff, people at school were asking me if I could DJ at house parties (by house I mean friends’ houses not the genre house lol) and whatnot. I never declined even though I hadnt really developed DJ skills. Syncing turntables wasnt a skill I had developed but since I was into music and stuff I could make a half-decent job at beatsyncing.
    I wasnt so much intrigued by the DJ aspect as I was from the actual music itself – therefore its creation/production. Needless to say as a kid I didnt even have money to buy turntables and mixer, let alone synthesizers and audio effect units. Just before 2000 I bought my first computer. Naturally I begun searching around the web for the topic that interested me most: and that was music. I discovered a magazine called “Computer Music” and I searched in my hometown and found a foreign press shop where I could buy the magazine. I became a fanatic – absorbing all the info I could get my hands on, studying the magazine, working with the provided freebies and searching on the web for books, info and articles about music production. Aroudn the same time Traktor in its first version was out. Before learning my way around DAWs I was using it to record loops out of commercial/released tracks I had (mainly out of Global Underground’s old CDs I had) and was creating my own tracks – which were not really tracks, just 30 minute overprocessed loops stolen from those tracks, re-imported into traktor and re-remixing them lol. I then moved on to FL Studio. I had finished school by then, but I remember a few occasions where at parties guys would play with CDJs and I at the after hours I would play with them too – again nothing big and nothing special because I had never practised.

    Needless to say of course, DJing looked to me as an easier way to communicate my creations with the audience but I never actually gave a lot of my time to it. I wanted to become good at making music thinking that playing that music afterwards would be far easier. I wanted to overcome the hard part which was making it.
    Years since then, i still try to improve my music making skills, and I have understood that DJing wasnt the easier part at all, its a different part alltogether.

    “Officially” so to speak, I became a DJ when a local DJ heard my music and contacted with me and asked me if I was into DJing – if you want to know specifically it happened a few months after creating a Facebook profile even though I used to have a Myspace profile for yeeeears – for some reason Facebook was and still is more powerful than other websites in Greece for networking. Even my own website wasnt noticed by locals.
    I said, “Yeah, sure, why not?” and thats how the whole story started. I had already bought controllers for music production and I knew I could make a decent job with them and my laptop. Since that 1st chance, I went to a lot of gigs as warming up for that guy and by doing so I became more confident with my set up and playing music in public up to the point I used social networking to spread my “brand” locally. I knew of course the “politics” involved when trying to organise a gig so I never organised my own gigs – I was just the guy who will not say “No” when invited to play. I guess I was lucky that I made a few key connections in the local “scene” and people usually think of me when organising gigs and want some tech – minimal – techno guy in the line-up. Still, to this very day, I have never organised a gig by myself, Im always invited – either by other guys or by the Web Radio stations I play in, to their gigs. I think the fact that I have also some official releases in Beatport has helped a lot – even when a guy hasnt heard about me, a quick browse on my networking profiles strikes a good impression (the “hey this guy is a producer – he must be a decent DJ” effect).

    Frankly, if you ask me up to the point where the term “Digital DJ” appeared, I never considered myself a DJ – I still do not with the literal meaning of the phrase. “DIsk Jockey”. I am not in any way a maestro at playing vinyl “disks” – Im just a guy making and playing electronic music, thats all! 😉 When people ask me at gigs whether “Im a DJ or a producer” I reply that “I consider myself a producer, who happens to DJ” – it always causes them to have a strange face – I guess they are full of people saying to them “Yeahhhh mannnn, Im the mannnn, Im the DJ, i am a producer too, mannnnn.” lol. Sometimes I ‘d admit “Im not a DJ” out of respect for those who actually were “DISK Jockeys” but people tend to think Im a snob who wants to emphasize that he is producing music and thinks he is somehow superior to DJs. Thats why I stopped saying that.

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 267 total)