Steelo
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Steelo
ParticipantDrBlue, post: 21579, member: 1831 wrote: There is some wrong in this statement.. Most brands have stronger torque than technics, even the cheaper ones like omnitronic and so on.. The reason for this (only certain models) is that the high end stantons and the cheaper ones have the same motor. They are known as Super OEM turntables.. the internal stuff is made in the same factory and sold to all the brands.
Build quality on the chassis (spelling?) and tonearm differ from the brands tho.. I still stick with my 1210mkII tho..
As for cdj`s i have no idea. Also i have only read about the other turntables, and looked at speccs.. I havent tried em.. I`ve heard that some numark ttx`s have failed quite fast.. manufacturing stuff.. Dont know about the credibility about the sources tho.There may be many brands that offer higher torque (quite a few of them are clones of the top stanton with a different badge on them) but the rest of the components may suck or they don’t perform to spec. I was talking about decks that are a viable Technics alternatives (although none will have the durability of Technics).
The previous generations of the TTX’s definitely had issues. A few generations later, after a few design changes and upgrades, have rock solid performance now.Steelo
ParticipantDj coRrupt Catalyst, post: 21570, member: 2159 wrote: i personally love mixing really chill, and relaxed dubstep, because the low sub-bass creates such an amazing groove. but if i’m in more of an up-beat mood, i’d have to go with either electro house, or Hardstyle, because of their euphoric melodies, and powerful bass.
-DJCC
I used to play a lot of hardstyle sets at raves. Still got a tonne of hardstyle vinyls sitting in a cupboard somewhere back home. It was a lot harder a few years back than it is now.
Steelo
ParticipantYep there’s a “limbo song”. There’s a few actually but the “official” one of my childhood was Chubby Checker – Limbo Rock
Steelo
ParticipantI would agree that 2.0.3 had the lowest load and it definitely got progressively worse. I must admit I was a little worried that the 2.5 update would not rectify this for me but I guess I was lucky.
Steelo
ParticipantYou can get windows running no problem, don’t doubt that if its the comfortable platform for you but it takes a lot more constant tweaking to get it running as well. Macs are literally turn off screensaver and wifi and you’re good to go. I used to be all about Windows until I got a MBP and I would never turn back for any audio or graphics work.
Steelo
ParticipantI think in general DJs are getting younger. A whole new world has opened up where you can download a free copy of Virtual DJ and be on your way. It used to involve $1000s of dollars but now a few hundred will get you a satisfactory setup.
Steelo
ParticipantGetting the highest spec’d processor you can afford is important but even more so is having plenty of ram. The larger the hard drive the better. A Solid state hard drive will be faster too but this is usually only found in high end machines and is pricey. Again, it should be a quality machine. If its got great specs but is really cheap then chances are it uses low quality components. These typically have issues, break or don’t perform to the quoted specs.
Steelo
ParticipantYep I had to keep rolling back to 2.0.3 as the next few updates gave me troubles, one of them being CPU load. It was obviously some sort of design flaw as 2.5 dramatically went down in load. I believe the next update may drop even lower again.
Steelo
ParticipantI own an S4. I also own the F1 but I’ll see what I can squeeze out of running the S4 alone and get back to you.
Steelo
ParticipantTerry_42, post: 21488, member: 1843 wrote: If you do not do heavy VJing or have many programs running in parallel it does not matter at all.
Any entry laptop will do.
More important is you have a system that won’t crash. I use a 4 year old MacBook pro and I guess it will do another 2 years before I replace it. It runs all DJ programs with ease and I can even have Ableton running in parallel if I wish.This is partially correct. I would not agree with saying an entry level laptop will do but you don’t have to spend too much to get a semi decent one that will be fine for regular mixing. When you get in to the more intensive stuff like running more decks, keylock, chaining effects etc it actually becomes quite CPU intensive.
There is a big difference from using a top of the line machine that a few years old compared to an entry level machine thats new. Your 4 year old MBP would probably outperform the majority of entry level (Windows) laptops.
Don’t only go off the specs though…quality + design should be a concern too. Theres a reason why Macs are expensive and not necessarily the highest spec’d machines, but are what you will find the majority of established DJs using.Steelo
ParticipantI remember there was one place that I played at every Sunday afternoon, that had Denon CDJs. Started bringing my CDJ1000’s with me as I hate those Denons. The new generation from Denon seem to be really decent now (Phil is quite partial to them, these days). Probably the only competition for Pioneer.
For turntables the top line Stantons, Vestax and Numarks are almost the only alternatives that offer decent enough build quality and torque. I recently purchased a brand new pair of the Numark TTX’s. I was on a budget and was only buying for a pair of turntables that won’t be leaving the bedroom for anything other than the ocassional house party. The Stantons would be my 2nd choice but they are still really expensive…still nothing compared to the cost of Technics these days! More expensive than they were 5 years ago! If cash allowed me, I would buy the Technics simply because I know exactly what I’ll get with them. The general consensus is that all the newer turntables only have a limited life whilst Technics just keep on going!Steelo
ParticipantYou have to bust out the limbo! I remember doing it at my early school dances and thinking it was awesome. I’ve been a guide for a various pub crawls and we still do it!
A danceoff of some sort would also work I think.
Your idea with Crank Dat sounds good. Could do Thriller or something also.Steelo
ParticipantI wouldn’t have a clue where you would get your hands on those types of tunes but I will say that you have to make peace with sacrificing your musical integrity (just a bit) to get those first few vital gigs. Either that or show up every night and spend a lot of cash shouting the important people drinks.
I’m sure you could google “Reggae classics” or “Soca top 50” or something like that to help with songs.June 5, 2012 at 1:42 am in reply to: Would you find a guide to using CDJs & "pro" gear useful? #1005631Steelo
ParticipantI think it would be useful to explain the “industry standard” equipment that may be encountered, in the booth. Whilst digital gear is being embraced more, there is no standard setup you will find for this equipment. You will, however, find a set of Pioneer CDJs and mixer in the vast majority of venues. Many of them still with a pair of Technics turntables also. It can be particularly daunting to jump in to a booth and not be familiar with the equipment, when you’re starting out.
Steelo
ParticipantHit the nail on the head D-Jam!
-
AuthorPosts