Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 74 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Convinced we need a beginner section…. #9104
    Kranic
    Member

    jezalenko, post: 9098 wrote: Make a Wiki out of the old blog articles – I think that’s the way to go!

    Not too sure about that, as that’s mostly “static” information, a Wiki is usually much better suited at the more dynamic information.

    However, all these ideas are good and well, but I’m more curious about Phil’s thoughts, as this is his brainchild afterall!

    in reply to: Legal implications of remixing / mashups #9100
    Kranic
    Member

    First off, interesting question! 😀

    As usual, I am in no form whatsoever a lawyer or even competent at law, so always get proper legal advice 🙂

    Alix Elder, post: 9094 wrote: My question is, if you get money from a gig using mash-ups does that count as well? You are getting paid for doing a mash-up, and although you are not selling the mash-up it’s self, could the money coming from the bar or club you mashed it up in be used against you?

    The first one should be covered by the club I think…because the club/bar has to pay to the local collection agency, such as ASCAP, BMI and SESAC. This usually covers all the music played in the club, including live performances, and they pay a set amount per year, performance or percentage of their revenue for using music. It’s basically the same as for live broadcasts on the radio, if you mashup 2 tracks together, they can just write up the titles.

    It gets iffy when your artist name is…say…Girltalk…and you use an average of 30+ tracks per track you make; but that’s a whole different discussion 😉

    Remember, get good and local legal advice, because this copyright and the internet and that’s where it gets reeeaaally complicated! 🙂

    in reply to: Beautifull people (move for me mash up) #9097
    Kranic
    Member

    DJ T3ch Hu5ky, post: 9075 wrote: You could say that but its more of a mash up.

    What I meant by that is, that most mashups are usually done in production software.
    Although they might originate from an actual mix, but by doing them in say Ableton or even Audacity, you get to play/tweak with much more settings!

    If you did it live in DJing software, all the more props to you! (I did my first one that way :s)

    Hence, my comment, all you need is a keyboard and a mouse to get it all arranged.

    No offence intended whatsoever!

    in reply to: Traktor Pro 2 skipping/glitches using S4 & Windows #9096
    Kranic
    Member

    simon light, post: 9083 wrote: i think if you dont have the minimum spec stated to run the software your asking for trouble.

    Or have a tendency to open lots and lots and lots of tabs in your browser 😉

    I do agree though, those recommendation don’t come for nothing.

    However, Windows 7 has Indexing on by default and the recommendations don’t specify the minimum speed of your actual harddrive. You could hook it up to SATA-3 and still have poor performance due to throughput limitations on disk itself.

    in reply to: Convinced we need a beginner section…. #9095
    Kranic
    Member

    simon light, post: 9084 wrote: as long as the right advice is offered for total noobz to dj,ing not just the stuff people have and use. i.e a total new commer to djing will not need a denon mc6000 or a traktor s4. but would benifit from a basic controller and software like maybe a hercules running le if you get what i mean.

    Perhaps a post or page on a Wiki (as SmiTTTen suggested), where the options could be listed?
    (Why go for a Ferarri if you only go grocery-shopping, right? :p)

    in reply to: Convinced we need a beginner section…. #9094
    Kranic
    Member

    SmiTTTen, post: 9087 wrote: Disagree – The fact that people want a beginners section indicates that people want to funnel off those questions so they don’t have to see them. So who is going to answer the beginners’ questions? It will be the blind leading the blind which doesn’t serve the long term interests of this community. Don’t get me wrong, the questions are frustrating – people need to actively research rather than passively research and if you need help with creative questions in a space that is purely creative – you might want to rethink the whole game.

    What we do need is an FAQ or Wiki. Something that the community can contribute to and develop over time.

    We were all new, lame and annoying once. Well, not me, I have been amazing from the very beginning.

    I’m sure you were! Hehe 😉 (Yes, that comment was meant sarcastically and should not be taken seriously in any form whatsoever. ;))

    In my experience and at least in my humble opinion, setting aside the topic here, it sometimes can be handy to incorporate all those frequently asked questions into a container of sorts, so new users to these forums can use them to their advantage and keeping the forums free/clean for the really interesting discussions.

    The exact form/format is, imho, only secondary to the point having such a knowledge-base of the more novice typed questions.

    Obligatory personal background bit; from gaming to programming, I’ve encountered these 101s, FAQs, KBs and other types read-firsts in some form; I’ve setup corporate Wikis and DMS’ in the past.

    About your suggestions, I think the initial wording might have put you on the wrong foot, but in the end I think it comes down to the same thing. Whether it be 1 post summing up links to different resources (articles, FAQs, Wikis, whatnot) or perhaps a section dedicated to the new souls venturing into this field of new technology.

    Somehow, somewhere, there has to be a pointer to the resources available for newcomers.

    Ultimately, I think a Wiki would be the best solution.*
    But to take your point into account, who would be responsible for the Wiki? The blind as well?

    It doesn’t really matter in what form it’s exactly done, and I’m sorry if I’m stepping on your turf here Phil, I think the main thing mr-stiffy tried to make was that it would be a great benefit for these forums in general if general information and pointers were available to newcomers in an easy “package”. The information would just be a hyperlink away. It’s more about making the information available more easily and centralised, instead having to browse/search the forum looking for specific information. It’s not about not seeing the questions, it’s about seeing the questions that matter.

    A central DigitalDJing Wiki might also be a really strong unique selling point for this community as well!

    Just my 2 cents, ymmv.

    in reply to: The 'Sync' button – ADE Conference 2011 Discussion. #9073
    Kranic
    Member

    And A-Trak up to a certain extent I guess, saw him live 2 years ago mixing turntablism with house, but the whole music industry is evolving in some weird way.

    Where are the good old times with J5 mashing it up live… 🙂

    in reply to: How The Major Labels Sold 'Electronica' To America #9070
    Kranic
    Member

    Awww… memories…

    in reply to: Convinced we need a beginner section…. #9069
    Kranic
    Member

    Seconded and may I suggest adding a “Pick a DJ Name” section to that sticky? 😉

    in reply to: The 'Sync' button – ADE Conference 2011 Discussion. #9068
    Kranic
    Member

    You had me at

    Dj iceman, post: 9061 wrote: ok time for some “my life is worse than yours” banter lol.

    😉

    I can totally understand it, because to some degree I think it also goes into the very essence of Hip-Hop…
    I think Guru explained it in the outro of Loungin’, but then again… (and I realise I’m preaching to the choir here as well :p) shouldn’t your choice in technology be disregarded as long as you remain true to that creative spirit? I mean, creating a whole new sound from 2 (or more) records instead of focussing on the turntables.

    Sometimes in order to see the point in something and be able to look beyond the technology, they need to see the motivation and respect behind it. Instead of turntables, you’ve got the jogwheels on your controller, and as you said:

    Dj iceman, post: 9061 wrote: people forget that sync ONLY matches up the bpms of 2 songs,the dj has to make them sound right

    , the software doesn’t pick records, scratches, or mixes it. Plus, you get extra creativity! Different tools, same platform. It’s not pre-recorded; you don’t do DAT, you do it live!

    (Sorry for putting up another bit of text, but I hope this might help you out as well. This is just how I tend to look at it.)

    It’s not the size of the tool, but how you use it! 😉
    (Haters compensating much? ;))

    (And props btw, I’ve always had huge respect for the hip-hop community for that “hackers”-mentality, taking something and combining it to something new. The only limit being your own creativity and imagination. Especially with some of the intelligent lyrics, using it as an expressive means. Kind of reminds me of Capoeira, but that’s a different story.)

    in reply to: CDJs #9063
    Kranic
    Member

    stuart, post: 9058 wrote: if you want the cdjs to practise on, buy secondhand cdj1000s or 800s, save a fortune so you can also get the macbook and s4, all for under the new price of the cdj2000, when it comes to gear more IS better!! lol!!

    Or even a pair of Reloops would do I guess…

    in reply to: Dj Name Troubles #1001991
    Kranic
    Member

    SmiTTTen, post: 8993 wrote: If someone can make a name for themselves with “Funtcase” – you can be successful with whatever works for you. Knock ’em dead!

    Funny detail, this just came by in my timeline:
    DUB NATION HARTFORD VOL. 6 featuring FUNTCASE & TERRAVITA

    in reply to: Novation unveil Twitch Live Translator #9032
    Kranic
    Member

    The Ableton stuff looks fun…the other stuff…less so.

    Especially the 4-deck part, in my opinion, it doesn’t even start to cover it…

    in reply to: CDJs #9029
    Kranic
    Member

    MBPRPG, post: 9024 wrote: Most djs I’ve spoken to in the area have recommended going down the cd route as quite a lot of the clubs where I hope to get work use cdjs

    If you can’t use your digital setup in a club at all, wouldn’t a basic setup be good enough to practice on?
    Or would you need to bring your own setup to the club?

    Wouldn’t your basic need be a setup you could use to practice on?
    Imho, you could still do that on a digital setup, but you’d need to keep a library of CDs for when you play in the club.
    And someone better correct me if I’m wrong!

    So, again:
    What would CDJ2Ks and the DJM2K allow you to do that you can’t do with your current setup? 🙂

    Just my 2 cents 😉

    in reply to: CDJs #1001989
    Kranic
    Member

    Phil Morse, post: 9017 wrote: Why CDJs? Seems like a step backwards from digital.

    Seconded!

    I can’t help but wonder…

    What would CDJ2Ks and the DJM2K allow you to do that you can’t do with your current setup?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 74 total)