DJ Vintage
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
DJ Vintage
ModeratorDifferent places, different markets.
Guess that is what makes our passion so interesting :-).
Again, good to see you found out what works for you. Not everyone on these forums is there (yet).
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorD-Jam, post: 40993, member: 3 wrote: Wow…I found a sloppy recreation of the timeline here: http://braithouse.tripod.com/guideto_eng.htm
wow … that caused all kinds of unwanted popups. Not a very nice site. Sorry dude.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorDirty Hippie, post: 40982, member: 4027 wrote: … Also, my wife and I had a fight over the cost of the scratching course, but now she would like to thank you as well. She said my DJ skills are improving, but she appreciates the new stuff I can do with my fingers… whatever that means 🙂
And she was probably happy to have you out of her hair hours on end practicing :-).
I agree. They have made amazing courses. My pace has dropped because of some family stuff, but the upcoming summer months will have me scratching acapella’s no doubt :-).
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorDayvue, post: 40990, member: 837 wrote: My reasons for having gone the DVS route instead of sticking with controllers, not in order:
1) Go to a gig without having to bring a controller/mixer/turntables… Are you saying every club has a DVS setup? They are pretty rare and far between here.
2) Learn to dj the original way. Appreciate the creative options that technology allows
… Not sure if you need to learn the old skool way to appreciate the technological advances
3) Actually scratching with a 12″ platter with torque instead of imitating it on CDJs
Ever tried the 9″ real vinyl, adjustable torque, spinning platter on the SC3900?
4) Be able to play actual vinyl (and therefore allowing me to dig for tracks in the bargain section of Vintage vinyl, the nearby record store). Acquire vinyl collection. Feel cool and hipster. Also note that if you shop for funk/soul/r&b, you can nowadays get like 20 songs for $3 or less at a record shop.
…If I am not mistaken, you can’t mix between playing control vinyl and playing actual records, can you? So, you’d have to switch your setup for playing actual vinyl as opposed to playing DVS with timecode vinyl, right?
And how about not having to lug anything to a gig, see point 1? The heaviest bit of kit in an old skool vinyl setup was … you guessed it … the crates of dead vinyl.5) See DVS feels “better” than a controller. It does.
… a matter of personal taste. I love the occasional round of vinyl playing (did so on Queensday here), but wouldn’t go back to doing my mobile gigs with vinyl or VDS systems.
6) You look cooler using turntables than using a controller.
… the big question here being, looking cooler to WHOM? Yourself in the mirror or the crowd. I doubt the latter care much either way.
Finally, the advantage of DVS over the NS7/V7/spinning platter things are
1) You can play real vinyl.
2) It is modular, and therefore more compatible when jamming with other people.
3) For me, controllers should be small and light (e.g. VCI 300/380). If you’re going to go big, go big (DVS).
4) if other djs want to use my equipment, tt’s are more versatible and universal… As I said the SC3900 have the real vinyl feel, according to those I know that own or have used them. I don’t see how it is more modular than any setup with two CDJs and a mixer or a controller setup for that matter. I actually think that more people know how to use CDJs these days than turntables, so not too sure about the using your equipment is easier.
Actually real vinyl used by someone NOT knowing what they are doing is more likely to lead to a) poor results and b) damage to your gear. I never loaned out my TTs to anybody that I didn’t know very well and who’s skill set I knew and trusted. Even then, they’d have to bring their own stylii.
Long story short. In my opinion playing real vinyl is totally different from playing DVS. Real vinyl is just slapping plastic on, reading the records, dropping the needle and doing your thing with a regular analogue mixer. Not technology involved.
DVS on the other hand is controller-based digital DJ-ing, you are just using timecode vinyl on turntables to control the tune. And yes, vinyl feels great, so I can see how that appeals to many people.I am happy for you that you found something that works for you. In my opinion ANY setup will work as long as it works for YOU.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorTrusting your ears = good 🙂 … if you have good ears that is :-p
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorThere is a pretty solid alternative to consider if you want to go DVS but still have the option of playing CDs and USB music AND control Traktor or other software.
The Denon SC3900 has a vinyl like rotating platter that (although somewhat smaller than a 12″ vinyl and according to those who used them) seems to behave awfully close to an SL1200 turntable. The good thing is that timecode is built-in, so you don’t have to use timecode CDs.
Get the X1600 mixer with it (Traktor Scratch certified and fully midi) and you have a pretty neat setup you can use in just about any configuration.
Just a thought.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorI am still unclear why you’d want buttons on screen that are on the actual hardware too.
Makes no sense to me, but then that is just me.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorAny reason for the non-harmonic mixing?
Not judging, just wondering about the creative process that led to this decision.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorD-Jam, post: 40971, member: 3 wrote: … Discoh I have no clue about.
If you are not Dutch I wouldn’t expect you to have a clue. It was a highly specialized if flimsy and (in retrospect) simple magazine. But great dance charts (with BPM of course), some good tips and tricks and like I said, really REALLY early adopters of musical key notation with the charts.
They also organised a Discoh Fair and for that event came out with a mix album. One of them (not sure about the others) mixed by no other than later famous Ben Liebrand. These are mixes from the days of Revox Reel Tape recorders and cut and splice techniques … we HAVE come a long way.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorColtrane09, post: 40973, member: 2800 wrote: *taking notes on what others take to their gigs* Good checklist to review!!! You guys rock!
On behalf of all of us … we are flattered, thank you!
DJ Vintage
ModeratorAnybody know if any copies of the revered Dutch “Discoh” magazine survived?
It was popular in the early-mid 80s and they were among the very first to feature a harmonic key!
Greetinx
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorI am a two-year user of the MC6000, effectively the 4-deck version of the MC3000. What info are you looking for?
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorGot it! Not offensive by the way, so no worries.
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
Moderatornick greek, post: 40936, member: 2957 wrote: 2x usb and my mdr 700s
In your original reply you said Mdr700 (not Hdr700). That is why I reacted with “Ok, I’ll show my ignorance.”. I Googled on MDR700 and found nothing relevant to DJ-ing. Then you reacted and I saw it was Hdr700. Obviously that is a set of cans.
Hence the mixup. All solved now though :-).
Greetinx,
C.DJ Vintage
ModeratorLike you saw me tell Terry, in the days before SL1200s we would actually glue pennies to the shell to get more pressure LOL.
And for the 1200s I seem to remember you could buy alternate “weights” at the end of the tone arm to increase the pressure. You’d have to also tweak the anti-skating then. Bit vague but I think it was spring loaded and you got a new spring with it to replace the old one. Something like that anyway, shoot me when I am wrong.
5grams was heavy even for us, but not uncommon. 3-4 was average. Nobody really did anything under 2.5 and that was considered running light.
And yes, needle dropping with a high pressure level will surely do more damage than the usage you are describing lol.
Greetinx,
C. -
AuthorPosts