Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 6,565 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Tablets vs PC's for DJing #2403491
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    First off: I am a late “convert” to Mac. And, being a total Windows guy (I only have a Mac for DJ-ing, all my other laptops and PCs are Windows), it bugs me to admit that yes, for various reasons, the Mac outperforms my Windows laptops (which I got very close and very stable by spending many hours tearing everything out of windows that was hampering performance, tweaking drivers and such), the Mac is ultimately more suitable for sound related work, imho, and without all the extra knowledge and time spent in getting it to that point. Apart from the OSX operating system and Apple’s total control, there are some other, very practical considerations as well.
    Having said that, this is not an Apple vs Windows issue. So we’ll move on from that one.

    DJ Software is DJ Software. Unfortunately not true. While in an operational sense they are, the choice of DJ software does really matter, based on your (expected) workflow. Let’s say you are a mobile DJ, not interested in (much) use of samples, or multi-track manipulation of songs. And you want to work with a wide variety of genres, including music that came from the days before drum computers. In that case I would say that Traktor, to me, would be the worst software choice around. And I am a mobile DJ and I did start with Traktor on a (then) supported Denon controller.

    If all you do is use your DJ Software to find tracks, make playlists and send tracks to decks to play them, then yes, DJ software is pretty much all the same, as they all share this very, very basic set of features. As soon as you want to expand the creative possibilities, the software starts to drift apart significantly. This is true for PC/Mac platforms.

    At this point in time, tablet software is just getting there, slowly. DJay for iPad is significantly less full-featured and potent than any of the PC software around. The spinning records looked positively toy-like and it isn’t all THAT long ago that the option to show parallel waveforms instead was introduced. Currently you can get DJ Pro for iPad, which is more of a carbon copy of the Mac version and I believe allows for synchronization between the two. Allowing editing on your iMac or Mac Mini and then having those changes available on your iPad.

    With the advent of iPad Pro and it’s big screen and powerful innards I believe we have gotten a step closer to where an iPad with a separate wireless keyboard/mouse combo might start taking over from the laptop, provided PC/Mac level software is ported to the platform (which I will believe will be the case).

    What you are suggesting though is using iPads as players and using a simple analogue mixer to hook everything up. Apart from sound quality issues (the iPad sound card isn’t quite up to par to what you would find on serious controllers), there is another major drawback to this setup. And that is synchronization between your players. There is no way to easily control that changes made to your tracks (simple example: an added cue point) sync correctly with the other tablets. This is one of the advantages of using DJ software (or even iPad software), all your tracks and analysis information in one place.

    I have seen a kid play once with two tablets and a very simple two-channel mixer. So it can be done. I did ask him if he used things like FX and such, but he did (honestly) confess that this wasn’t as easy as when he used his controller. The point here being that tactile feedback from controllers (physical knobs, buttons, faders) is just not comparable to touching a glass plate, especially in the heat of the moment.

    Clearly there are iPad-ready controllers that will double as midi-controllers. You can take one of those with your laptop (DJ Pro for example) for full on DJ-ing or take it with just your iPad (also DJ Pro). You can even then take your iPad and DJ with it solo (both decks controlled from the one iPad) for impromptu parties. Just add a DJ splitter cable, your headphones and a lead to hook up to any set of powered speakers or a PA.

    Just my three cents worth.

    in reply to: DDJ SB/RB users please help #2403481
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Clearly not having (enough) power on the SB will hamper it’s proper working. It’s USB only powered.

    A 5 meter USB extension cable is no problem. What you need to do, imho, is get a small, POWERED, USB-hub. Plug your SB into the powered hub with a regular cable, then run the long cable/extension to your iMac. Your SB should now have enough power and I am gonna wager a guess that your sound problems will be gone too. With regards to that, this is assuming you are not running very long unbalanced RCA leads to your mixer.

    in reply to: ion dj2go help? #2403471
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Applause for mapping your own controller. The problem with mapping is that it is usually supported from controller to software (i.e. what happens when you push buttons or move faders or the platter), the other way around (i.e. what lights have to light up and such) is usually far more complicated and less DIY.

    What I don’t understand though is that DJ Pro supports the Ion DJ2Go natively, so it should work plug and play out of the box!

    What went wrong?

    in reply to: Diffrerence Between Software and Hardware Mixer #2403461
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    What is the biggest reason you feel you shouldn’t get the 8000?

    in reply to: Hi #2403441
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Hi Craig, welcome to the forums. We will gladly answer your questions. Be sure to browse the posts in these forums and on the main site for information. If you have anything specific you are looking for, be sure to post your question.

    in reply to: Diffrerence Between Software and Hardware Mixer #2402331
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    At the end of the day the integration of all-in-one controllers is such that there really is no need to go modular anymore.

    It’s also easier to show up at a place and put your master output in the house mixer and be done with it, while at the same time being fully and totally familiar with everything on your controller.

    Most analogue mixer are pretty straightforward. One of the more tricky things is FX use though. Each analogue mixer will have different ones and different ways to assign them and set parameters. Some won’t have FX at all. Some will have only one available FX at a time. On your controller you often have the option to use two FX channels which you can assign to the channel of your liking and which often consists of one 3-parameter effect or for example 3 stacked ones. Giving you way more creative options. On your controller it pays to get familiar with those options, on a (third-party) analogue mixer I feel it’s extra work, limiting options and generally a pain.

    in reply to: BPM in Rekord Box DJ #2402241
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Also, please do not write post titles in ALL CAPS. It’s considered shouting and shouting is impolite and we are all about polite here.

    in reply to: BPM in Rekord Box DJ #2402231
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    You are telling us very little, what exactly you are trying to change, what kind of music, what purpose.

    Depends on what you are trying to achieve. Two options I think:
    1) temporary changing the BPM in order to (beat) match another track
    2) permanent changing of the BPM because the software analysed it wrong

    1) This you do with your pitch fader or pitch buttons. As soon as you load the track again next time that information is gone. If this is what you are trying to do, I really don’t understand why. Every time you have to make adjustments to BPM of course, depending on track mixing out of and track mixing in to.
    2) This of course is easier and makes more sense. When you analyse a track RB will set BPM and corresponding beat grid. If the BPM is incorrect, then the beat grid will be incorrect as well. You can go into beat grid mode and change the beat grid manually. This will change the BPM too. The other way around works also, if you change the BPM (you can use the tap button to get it close to right) the beat grid will change. This information will be saved by RB and used next time. Careful though, if the beat grid is correct and you want to give a track another permanent BPM and change the BPM value from what the track originally is to something you want, it will move the beat grid, so that will no longer match the tracks beat, making it impossible for sync to work properly.

    Finally there is one very common reason to want to change BPM and that is the 1/2 or 2x mistake software makes. Sometimes the software can’t figure out the correct BPM and will report the speed as half or twice what it really is. So your 150 BPM track might be reported as 75. Or a slow track at 70 might be reported (and beat gridded) as 140. You can set the range that RB uses and if you have this happen a lot because of the genres you play, you might want to change the default range to something that better fits your needs. Individual tracks can be corrected in beat grid mode by clicking the 1/2 or 2x button. It will automatically reset the beat grid for you to match the new tempo.

    Hope that helps.

    in reply to: Tuesday & Friday Fun Factory? #2402191
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Good to hear, keep it up!

    in reply to: Tuesday & Friday Fun Factory? #2402011
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    No sweat, my man, must have missed the heads up. Where in Europe were you? Is she better?

    in reply to: Problems With Gear – How do I solve this? #2401661
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Glad you have at least some kind of work-around that works for you.

    in reply to: Problems With Gear – How do I solve this? #2401621
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    It won’t say focusrite I think. That would be that person’s sound card. In your case I’d assume it means switching from S4 to built-in and then back.

    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    I think “us” mobile gigs get that more than especially our younger counterparts that entered DJ-ing out of a sense of wanting to be the next Tiesto, Armin or Guetta.

    And it’s harder to be mad at a friendly guy if he makes a mistake than it is at a … you know what.

    in reply to: Light choice for beginner #2401561
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Yep, taped (sorry, velcroed 😀 ) looks a lot neater.

    in reply to: Problems With Gear – How do I solve this? #2401551
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    focusrite is a brand of sound cards, perhaps he was using one?

    I think I did see something like that as a workaround in the Traktor link you shared. Instead of Focusrite you probably have to read “your sound card”.

    This apparently resets the audio driver.

Viewing 15 posts - 526 through 540 (of 6,565 total)