Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 6,565 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hi from xeorex #2427101
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Any, to be honest.

    If you want something a bit more robust than the hercules, you might want to check out the new Numark Mixtrack Platinum. Ohter contenders for good, solid starter controllers (if you are not going the Traktor DJ route) are the Denon MC2000, Pioneer DDJ-SB2 (or RB, but only if you are 200% certain that RekordBox DJ is the software platform of choice for you) and the Reloop Beatmix 2.

    Yep, the EV is clearly a few steps up. You can use your Alto sub with new tops, but if you buy an extra sub, I’d stick with the EV-series. Matching gear usually sounds better.

    I have one 18″ sub and two 12″ tops, plus two extra 12″ tops (same brand, other model). I’d pair 15″ subs with 12″ tops if you are using two subs, or a single 18″ with 12″ tops. If you are going the heavy duty route, double 18″ subs would best be used with either 4x 12″ or 2x 15″ tops.

    in reply to: Hi from xeorex #2426961
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Yep, I prefer wood to plastic as well. Most subs will be wood though. When you start looking for active top end speakers, the higher end ones will be wood, lower end plastic. Don’t trust cheap wooden one. In any event, the truth for PA gear is still “you get what you pay for”.

    As for Mackie, they have some models that are love or hate (the Thump comes to mind), they have some reasonable mid-range stuff. I tried the HD-series I have in a showroom in direct A-B comparison and the only thing that came close enough to make it a decision was the (pre-Behringer) TurboSound. Naming Behringer and RCF in one sentence is funny. They come in TOTALLY different categories (both based on price and quality). I have a long and unfortunately not too positive history with Behringer. With Behringer it really depends what type and model of gear. You can find a few good things, butt here is plenty that, even at the low prices, turns out to be too low a quality.

    And yes, you can find bad info on everything online. It pays to find out the quality of the source.

    SpeakOn to XLR is a very uncommon cable as very few amps or speakers have XLR connectors anymore. Not in the least to prevent people from connecting the wrong sources. If you were to put the SpeakOn into your speaker output on the amp and then put the XLR end accidentally into an input on your mixer or active speaker there is a fair chance you will blow up electronics. It’s a cable I do NOT have in my collection (and trust me when I say I have almost every conceivable cable option in my crate). The SpeakOn to mono Jack isn’t much better (although most mic inputs are XLR only, but you’d be in trouble with Jack or Combo inputs on say a mixer or active speaker), so you need to clearly mark the Jack end of the cable with a bright color tape or something to make clear that this is a speaker lead, not a signal cable.

    This is the cable I ment: https://www.thomann.de/nl/sommer_cable_monolith_1_powercon_xlr_10m_2.htm.

    You could run this from a box like this near your DJ booth: https://www.rolight.nl/image/picture/ROLIGHT133317_web.jpg (you put power into the blue one, the whites go to your other gear)

    At the speaker stack you would have a box like this: http://static.webshopapp.com/shops/030335/files/048202380/keraf-15-dl-schuko-verdeeldoos-met-powercon-in-uit.jpg so you could hook up your active speaker, your active sub and something else (light for example).

    This setup would have you running only one cable to each speaker stack, cutting back on cabling in a big way.

    in reply to: Hi from xeorex #2426771
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Most PA mixers will have more mic than stereo inputs, it’s the nature of the beast. You could go a lot smaller, like the Yamaha MG06. Hooking up a phone or iPod for backup will do nicely.

    Cable: there is no use for SpeakOn to XLR! Your speakers have either posts (which you don’t want to be using) or mono Jack. So you need to go from SpeakOn (amp outputs) to mono Jack (passive speaker inputs).

    Speakers: I would personally suggest getting rid of the amp/passive speakers and adding two Alto 12″ active speakers in the mix. While I am not big fan of Alto, the 12″ active ones are more practical, look a bit more DJ-like and will most likely sound better. Later you can add a 2nd sub if needed.

    Really, the time of passive speakers and amps, imho, is behind us. There is really no compelling reason for it anymore. It only adds to the cable mess. You can always use an extension/break-out power cable to get enough power outlets. For the speakers you can actually get cable with integrated XLR and PowerCon cables.

    in reply to: Brand new Dj #2426291
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Good luck with your choice.

    in reply to: Affordable rotary mixer? #2426281
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Hey, we are pretty much of the “if it works for you, go for it” variety here.

    Most DJ mixers I know are still not DSP based (I could be wrong though :-)), for lots of mixers with a “digital” signature the digital part will usually consist of either a built-in sound card – only used for the sound coming out of the PC – and/or a digital FX engine. A true digital mixer (imho) is one that goes AD right at the first input stage and DA just before the master out and indeed you would then have all summing done in the on-board software. If the software is external, I would not consider them mixer rather than controllers with analogue inputs.

    It’s an interesting field, especially if – like me – you are not only a DJ but also a certified sound engineer 😀

    For the majority of our readers the controller/laptop combo in some form or another is still the most practical and powerful and “don’t break the bank” kind of solution. Clearly there are all sorts of variations and everyone is free to pursue his/her dream configuration.

    Lord knows I have gone through heaps of gear in my time and still do (controller 4 in 5 or 6 years coming soon).

    in reply to: Hi from xeorex #2426271
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Hi, thanks for the introduction. Welcome to the forums.

    Reading your gear list and your report of your first gig, the first thing I have to say is good job making it work on such short notice and still having the crowd going.

    I am sure you have a good reason to have a reasonably large PA mixer in the setup.

    There is only one “proper” way to hook this setup up correctly if you want to use all gear:

    1) Output 1/2 from the Hercules (RCA) to channel 5/6 on XS8 (Jack unbalanced). Cable: 1 cable 2x RCA (male) to 2x Jack male (TR)
    2) XS8 main out (XLR) to Alto Sub input (XLR). It is important to connect both Left and Right channel to the sub! Cable: 2 cable XLR male to XLR female
    3) Alto Sub output (XLR) to Prosound amp input (XLR). Important that the switch “output full range” is OFF! Cable: 2x cable XLR male to XLR female
    4) Prosound amp output to CM1210 speakers input. I couldn’t figure out the input connectors of the CM1210 (you can post a pic if you are unsure), but I think they have both bare wire posts and Jack (mono). Cable: 2x cable SpeakOn 2P to Jack Mono.

    Finally, you have an amp that delivers about 340W RMS into 8Ohm and speakers that can only handle 125W RMS. This is only 1/3 of the amps power. So you have to be VERY careful not to set the amp to high.

    I think you already know that none of this is very high end gear, so be sure to check with us by the time you want to upgrade so we can give you some solid advice on what to buy and what not.

    Hope that helps some.

    in reply to: Brand new Dj #2425851
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    The Mixtrack Pro is a good controller and should suffice for a bit longer, until you have enough knowledge about workflow to figure out what the proper upgrade for you should be.

    Even is money is not an issue, setting a budget helps narrow your choices down. While the SZ is a nice controller, it is also the most expensive one around and frankly I think it’s way overpriced. The SX2 for example would be as good for 95% of the DJs. Only if you need/want some of the specific features of the SZ (which you will know once you have enough insight into your workflow) would the extra money be worth it. Another powerhouse (also suited for Serato) controller to upgrade to would be the new Denon MCX8000. So there are plenty of options.

    The NS7 is just about the only serious option if you want spinning vinyl platters. Again, don’t buy a controller like this unless you are certain that this is a feature that YOU want/need.

    Not sure if you have already, but at this point I would say to have a look at the How To Digital DJ Fast course, it will help you check your progress and accelerate it and have you practicing the right things the right way. Also the Pro Mixtape Formula course would help you a lot I think. http://www.digitaldjtips.com/how-to-dj-training-courses/pro-mixtape-formula/

    Hope that helps some.

    in reply to: Scratching for DJ Course #2425841
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    We have a forum for information about the forum itself (FAQ, News, etx.) which is where you originally posted this. We have forums about DJ software and hardware, not relevant to your question. Also a forum for Mixes, Music and Shows which is pretty self-explanatory and also not relevant to your question. Of course Introduce Yourself which is, right!, to introduce yourself if you are a new reader. There is the Non-DJ Chat forum for everything you want to talk about that isn’t DJ-related, like your favorite TV-show or movie. Finally there is the DJ Booth. This is to discuss all things DJ-related that don’t fit in the other categories. Like questions about courses. Hence this is why I moved your post to DJ Booth.

    Since the courses are run by the main site, there is no specific forum here dedicated to course-related questions. But when they are posted in DJ Booth, we are more than happy to provide any help and information we can.

    in reply to: Would Traktor suit my needs better? #2425631
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Tough question. I think going to the S2 is a limiting move. No support (hardware) for Stems, which I think is one of the features that would make someone pick Traktor over other software, especially if you want to remix on the fly. Also only 4 performance pads (which is limiting if you are into the whole slice and dice thing).

    Serato has many features that allow you to do many crazy things too. Tone play is one but also Serato Flip.

    I am not saying the NS6 is the correct controller for you though. For Traktor I would sooner look at the S5 or (depending on your budget) the S8. Controllers without jogwheels for example, but coming from Ableton you probably won’t really miss them. But full support for things like Stems and Remix Decks.

    I hope others will pitch in and that this is of some help to you.

    in reply to: Best budget dj lights? #2425621
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    You are welcome and good luck. Keep on spinning!

    in reply to: Brand new Dj #2425611
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    There are several recent posts on here describing how to best go about figuring out your workflow, picking software, setting a budget and shortlisting and finally buying gear.

    It really depends on how you want to create mixtapes. You can do it in software like Ableton, with specific software or with DJ Software and a controller.

    So, tell us a little bit more where you are in your current thought process and we might be able to give you some nudges in the “right” direction for you.

    in reply to: Buying a mixer #2425601
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Hmmm … that is like someone saying he started driving a Tesla a month ago but now bought two 1952 chevy’s without power steering and power brakes.

    And it is really beyond me if you have a controller with DJ software why you would ever want to switch to ancient CDJs that don’t even have USB support (as in can’t be used as controllers, nor can they handle USB-sticks) and that can ONLY be used with regular CD’s.

    There is absolutely no reason why you can’t achieve your goals of mixing “properly” (whatever that means in your opinion) and “learn my library” (a good plan on any platform) on a controller.

    The mixers you mention are either old or very limited in features (like not even filters) or just plain not such nice mixers (my personal experience with the 350 for example is less than stellar).

    Sorry to say, but my advice would be to get rid of the CDJs asap and stick with your controller. Spending even more money on limited and/or outdated gear in order to use those two dinosaurs is a terrible waste imho.

    The money you save by not buying the mixer and perhaps selling the 800s is much much better spent buying some music and taking one or more of the Digital DJ Tips courses (like How To Digital DJ Fast). With that last course, you will learn “proper” mixing and many other things (including some basic effects use) in less than two months. It will teach you what to practice and how to practice it the correct way to help you avoid figuring it all out yourself and having to go back to relearn things you learned an incorrect way the first time.

    Just my three cents, as usual.

    in reply to: FTB Amico 10 USB vs LD Systems DAVE 12 G3 #2425431
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    All the systems I described are portable. The arrays often existing of as little as two to as much as 8 small speakers (2 or 3″ for example), making them very compact but with excellent sideways and vertical dispersion. And the subs are usually 8″” to 15″ versions.

    Not sure where you looked at RCF gear, but they are and have been a mainstay in PA systems since forever.

    This is the portable version I was talking about: http://www.rcf.it/en_US/professional-speaker-systems/evox/evox-8

    I have great PA now (Mackie HD-series), but if I were to buy something new, this would be it (although I might opt for the Evox-12).

    Another option (for example) is the Bose L1 Compact. Haven’t heard it myself but some people mentioned it on this forum and seemed enthusiastic about it. https://www.bose.com/en_us/products/speakers/portable_pa_speakers/l1-compact-system.html#v=l1_compact_black

    And this is the new LD Systems Curv I mentioned: https://www.thomann.de/nl/ld_systems_curv_500_ps.htm?offid=5&affid=1&subid=362010NL&subid2=LD+Systems+Curv+500+PS&origin=boost&gclid=CMvMscGnoM4CFaEW0wodZI4BjA

    in reply to: Speaker placement #2425421
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    First: I changed both your header and text because it was in ALL CAPS. It’s poor etiquette to use all caps as it is considered shouting and thus impolite. So please refrain from doing this.

    On-topic
    – subs are most likely also powered (active) speakers. We talk about subs (short for sub-woofer) and tops (top-end speakers), the latter also called full-range speakers. If they have built-in amplifiers they are called active or powered speakers, if not they are called passive speakers.
    – There are many (correct) ways to set up your main PA. Slightly in front of the DJ booth and a few feet to either side is surely one of them. One on each of the four corners of the dance area aimed at the middle is another. And plenty of variations in between. The reason to put them in front of the booth is to have no/less problems when using a microphone (feedback). The 4-corner setup helps distribute the sound with more balanced volume over the dance floor and contain the sound somewhat in the dance area.

    The further you put the main speakers away, the bigger the problem with latency becomes. Hence the need for monitor(s).

    Monitor placement depends on the type of monitor, the space behind the booth and your personal preference. I have seen booths with two 15″ powered speakers on stands on either side of the DJ’s head like a super-sized headphone. Personally I always use one ear for headphone cueing so I don’t need or even want a monitor on that side. I will always have only one and it will be on the other side of the headphone cueing.

    I have a pretty compact monitor that sits on microphone stand which I set on hip height and tilt upwards at my ear. You could, if you prefer, set a speaker on a stand at the height you prefer (ear height makes sense) or you could use a floor monitor firing upwards at your ear (keep an eye on the correct angle). I have my monitor slightly to the side of booth firing at me. Directly next to you is an option as well. I advise against setting your monitor behind you, due to the way sound and your ears work.

    Hope that helps some.

    in reply to: Affordable rotary mixer? #2425391
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Good to see people are reading posts of close to a year old, not sure that reviving them is a good idea though 😀

    1) Adjustable cross-over. A cross-over is a frequency filter needed to use a multiple amp system. With today’s PA systems they are either active and/or they come with perfect external cross-over filters. So gonna assume you are talking about the master out equalizer control (not a cross-over as the unit only offers master/booth stereo out, not multi-band output). While interesting to have a three-band EQ on your master output to adjust for room acoustics, three-band EQ is probably the worst tool for adjusting a room and it’s easier to make things worse than better. The trade-off in the Omnitronic case seems to be that you only get two- instead of three-band EQ on the channels, taking away the mid-range EQ as a creative tool. All in all I am really not impressed with the features of this mixer.

    2) My personal experience with Omnitronic gear is not particularly good. I would not qualify them as an A-brand. And most definitely nowhere near Rane or comparable brands. Not sure why you think analogue is a good thing, but most fader-mixers from respectable brands are analogue. Probably why they call them (as a type of gear) analogue mixers :D.

    Now whether you prefer a setup with analogue mixer and either controllers (XDJs for example) or media-players (CDJs) or an all-in-one controller solution is of course a very personal matter, but I’ll stick with my previous commentary that I fail to see what rotary offers over fader based analogue mixers.

    One very small thing I was just now thinking of is that I know quite a few DJs that don’t use the x-fader (including myself) but fader-riding during transitions. Most of us are more than capable of moving two faders independently with one hand. I can say from experience that this is something that is extremely hard to do on a rotary mixer, if not impossible depending on the layout. Just to mention one practical drawback (that would influence your workflow in a big way).

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 6,565 total)