Home 2023 Forums Non-DJ Chat Why You Should Buy Music

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #15690
    D-Jam
    Participant

    I think there are plenty of free and legal resources for music now that even the broke DJs have no excuse to pirate.

    My only debate I have on media rights are when I am told what I can or can’t do with it. If I decide to re-edit a tune for myself and use it…I should not be sued UNLESS I’m giving it away or selling it. When I say “re-edit”, I mean when the tune hasn’t changed much, but I might have rearranged it to lengthen a break or shorten the tune.

    In terms of movies, I get mad when it’s suddenly “illegal” to take a DVD I bought legally and rip/convert it for my own personal use on a mobile device. It’s gouging customers to tell them if they want to play a movie they legally bought on DVD on a mobile device, that they have to shell out more money for the digital file. It’s the same when I decide to change the ID3 tags or file name to suit my needs on a music file.

    I figure as long as I’m not giving it out to everyone, I should be able to do whatever I want with what I legally paid for.

    #1003109
    Johnnystorm
    Member

    D-Jam, post: 15764, member: 3 wrote: I think there are plenty of free and legal resources for music now that even the broke DJs have no excuse to pirate.

    My only debate I have on media rights are when I am told what I can or can’t do with it. If I decide to re-edit a tune for myself and use it…I should not be sued UNLESS I’m giving it away or selling it. When I say “re-edit”, I mean when the tune hasn’t changed much, but I might have rearranged it to lengthen a break or shorten the tune.

    In terms of movies, I get mad when it’s suddenly “illegal” to take a DVD I bought legally and rip/convert it for my own personal use on a mobile device. It’s gouging customers to tell them if they want to play a movie they legally bought on DVD on a mobile device, that they have to shell out more money for the digital file. It’s the same when I decide to change the ID3 tags or file name to suit my needs on a music file.

    I figure as long as I’m not giving it out to everyone, I should be able to do whatever I want with what I legally paid for.

    Yeah I agree with you on this one hundred percent, I’m just getting tired of some of my friends always saying there’s no point in buying music when you can just get it for free. I mean yeah sure you can get it for free, but that doesn’t mean its going to be perfect like it would be from buying it online or whatever.

    #15770
    D-Jam
    Participant

    Pick their favorite artist and ask them how they would feel if he/she came on Facebook and publicly quit…stating the vast amount of piracy and lost money led them to give up on music.

    Easiest way to put it. They can rationalize to death on how much more money they make in touring and such, but just like that they could decide to quit altogether, or stop producing and just run services to make money off other producers where those guys lose on piracy, but not him.

    #15877
    Johnnystorm
    Member

    D-Jam, post: 15844, member: 3 wrote: Pick their favorite artist and ask them how they would feel if he/she came on Facebook and publicly quit…stating the vast amount of piracy and lost money led them to give up on music.

    Easiest way to put it. They can rationalize to death on how much more money they make in touring and such, but just like that they could decide to quit altogether, or stop producing and just run services to make money off other producers where those guys lose on piracy, but not him.

    You make a very good point on that, music is so cheap now so I don’t see why its such a problem to buy a track for.

    #16547
    Papa Bear
    Member

    D-Jam, post: 15764, member: 3 wrote:
    I figure as long as I’m not giving it out to everyone, I should be able to do whatever I want with what I legally paid for.

    And here is the problem, which I see in today’s world.
    Publishers and governments do not see the customer in possession of what he paid for, but merely “leasing” it.
    Meaning, you buy the movie, but you don’t own a copy of the movie but the license to view it.
    With this understanding comes the (in those institutions way of thought) that altering it, remixing, shortening or peeing on the booklet changes the product itself and is to be pursued by law.

    What really pisses me off is the fact that everybody on the planet is (thanks to ACTA and others) under general suspicion and state/police institutions are allowed to sniff my computer and everybody else’s just to have a look whether you are doing bad things or not.
    I mean WTF? If I sneak into your bedroom and watch you 6ang your wife, just to make sure you are treating her according to the law, I clearly am a criminal. But THEY are allowed to? Sorry, this is a major break of privacy, and it happens now, and all we can do is sit there helplessly and wait what comes next.

    #16681
    D-Jam
    Participant

    In my experiences, I only know that when the guy giving something for free is taking money away from the owners, then they’ll sue.

    So if I made a remix of a new Rihanna track, post it for free download, and suddenly DJs and Rihanna fans all over are downloading my remix over buying the original tracks, then the label will make trouble…even if my remix sounds very different from the original.

    This is why I never worry about all the mixes I have posted on my site. To this day I don’t think I’m taking any money away from anyone…hence why I never got more than a “THANK YOU” from labels for using their tracks.

Viewing 6 posts - 16 through 21 (of 21 total)
  • The forum ‘Non-DJ Chat’ is closed to new topics and replies.