Home 2023 Forums The DJ Booth Weak sounding DJ mixes

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2334941
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Your mixer most likely has rec(ord) out RCA’s for the purpose of recording (duh). You should use those and not any other output. If only because the rec out is not affected by the master volume. RCA to 3.5mm jack into your laptop/audacity should work ok. Quality improvement will happen if you get a decent USB sound card and run the RCA into the sound card RCA in. So make sure your sound card is at least 1+1 (out AND in).

    #2335401
    Jonny Hatchman
    Participant

    Yes I’m fully aware of the recording output on my mixer, that wasn’t my question. Is there any soundcards (not too expensive) that anyone could recommend that would significantly improve the sound quality and fullness of my mixes?

    #2335641
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    You did say you used a 1/4 jack from the mixer, which is NOT an RCA output, so isn’t the record out. 1/4 jacks are typically balanced outputs or inputs.

    The thing that I tried to convey is that while using a USB sound card you will get you some quality improvement, I have made many DJM to laptop recordings through the 3.5mm jack input of my laptop without any problem. So, my concern is that recommending you a sound card is not gonna solve your problem.

    To answer your question, I’d stick with DJ sound cards, as the more “studio” type ones will have inputs, but usually for mics (1/4″ or XLR balanced), in which case you are paying for mic preamps, expensive connectors and often controls you don’t need.

    Something like the Numark Stereo IO offers one input/one output for little money. There is also a Stereo IO2.
    Lexicon Alpha is a few bucks more and has RCA input as well.
    If quality is the main concern, the Lexicon would rate higher on my list than the Numark, but that is based on general brand experience, not a/b comparison of these two particular products.

    #2335681
    Alex Moschopoulos
    Participant

    I dunno. Maybe I’m not getting what you’re going into, but it sounded fine to my ears.

    I think “punchy”, “loud”, or “big” comes from a few factors:

    1. The tunes you choose. I notice my trance mixes always sound way more “punchy”, “loud”, and “big” than a deep house or tech house mix. Some tunes were meant to sound “big” while others more “intimate”. Your track selection definitely sounds more “intimate”.

    2. Outside factors. I’ll listen to a live set with some levels of echo/reverb and crowd sounds, and of course it’ll sound “big”, but I put that on the outside factors as opposed to the actual mix.

    I agree maybe a better interface as Vintage suggested would help, but I’d also consider the factors I dove into.

    #2335931
    Jonny Hatchman
    Participant

    Okay thanks for the advice guys. Maybe I’m just worrying about it more than I should. I just always feel nearly all the good mixes I find on soundcloud have that kind of mastered feel to them to bring out as much of the sound as you can. I feel like like my mixes lose that fullness after I record them. If anyone else has any suggestions, it would be most appreciated.

    Thanks Jonny

    #2336031
    Todd Oddity
    Participant

    I hit a similar problem on one of my older laptops I was trying to use for recording, and it was the input jack on the laptop – it was not calibrated as a line-in, just as a mic-in, and therefore any line level inputs sounded like garbage and I was never able to find a workaround using the jack. I picked up a cheap Sound Blaster USB audio card with an RCA input and an RCA output on it and that did the trick.

    Audacity shouldn’t be the problem for you – I use it all the time without any issues at all.

    #2336951
    Mike Ward
    Participant

    Hi Johnny,

    the good mixes I find on soundcloud have that kind of mastered feel to them to bring out as much of the sound as you can

    That may be because they’re actually being mastered! I know when I record live mixes (into Ableton) I usually put a mastering rack on my master channel afterwards and just have a little tweak. Nothing major, but a little compression, a touch of EQ perhaps. It can make a difference (particularly for overall loudness, which is often the issue).

    For what it’s worth I do record into an audio interface, a Focusrite Scarlett 2i2, but I’ve recorded straight into laptop line-in to similar effect – I don’t think an audio interface would have a massive impact on your situation. Best advice is borrow one from a friend if you can and try it out 🙂

    Cheers,
    Mike

    #2338201
    Stazbumpa
    Participant

    What is the point in mastering that which has already been mastered? The music you’re playing has already been through that process, you won’t add anything by doing all over again. I think D-Jam has the right of it, it’s probably got more to do with the tunes you selected and what (or where) you are listening to your mix on.

    #2338211
    deathy
    Participant

    The only thing I do in post with my mixes is normalize the peak to 0dB.

    #2349241
    DJ Spinn
    Participant

    The best advise I can gve is “master” your mixes. Give them some punch and level them out with a good compressor, add a little presents by using subtle EQ’ing (by “subtle” I mean don’t over-do it). And lastly use a limiter (not pushing it anymore than -5 db’s) and bring your overall mix to 0 db’s with it for the final output. Use your ears and they should begin to sound better. But before even going that far, make sure you record your mix properly, by using the “REC” output from your mixer into (lets say) a USB audio interface like the Focusrite 2i2 or 2i4. They offer superb playback and recording quality. Check out my stuff as proof: http://www.mixcloud.com/djspinn

    #2349261
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    I’ll second Staz’s comment about it not making sense to master (there are exceptions but only if you sprung for some very serious mastering software AND have the knowledge and experience to work it properly – so well beyond the scope of this post) a mix that consist of material already mastered to death when you buy it. Even worse is the fact that while they are mastered beyond a reasonable limit, the mastering still differs from track to track.

    Taking already flat pancakes and trying to get them even flatter isn’t gonna work I am afraid.

    Finally, good mastering is something even lots of studio engineers don’t do themselves but leave to the dedicated specialists, it’s THAT difficult to get right.

    Just my (sound engineer) two cents, as usual.

    #2357031
    Trav
    Participant

    Maybe it’s just my untrained ear but the quality sounded normal over here. I will listen to the entire mix soon to see if I can hear any difference.

    #2361311
    Jonny Hatchman
    Participant

    Thanks again people. I think you’ve hit a nutshell DJ Spinn. I’ve just listened to a couple of your mixes and the sound quality is absolutely sublime, exactly the kind of richness and smoothness I’m looking for and talking about. I think I’ll be investing into a focusrite interface, I have always heard really good things about them. When you say add a GOOD compressor, do you mean download a separate compressor plug-in to the one on audacity or just use a compressor well? Do you use audacity as your recording software? I understand the need to adjust the EQ, limit, normalise etc, but don’t see the need to compress the sound (even slightly), with a DJ mix.

    Thanks Jonny

    #2361781
    DJ Spinn
    Participant

    Hi Jonny, Thank you for the compliment and having taken time to listen to my mixes. Now, when I mentioned using a “good” compressor, I meant just that. There are hundreds of compressor plugins out there from many different companies, including those that come with Audacity or other programs, but the fact of the matter is, using a “good” compressor will make your DJ mixes rich and smooth. For example, in my case, I use nothing but “Waves” plugins. I use a lot of their analog modeled plugins; like the SSL Collection, the CLA collection, the V-Series collection, the API collection, as well as their Masters Bundle, which comes with some amazing processors including their LinMB, which is a linear phase multiband compressor, and works wonders on my mixes. Out of that collection, my “go-to” compressors are the LinMB and the CLA-2A and the CLA-3A for compression. At the end of the chain I’ll throw the L2 in there to keep the peaks at 0 db. Lately I’ve been using the CLA-3A a lot more as opposed to the other two on almost all my mixes, and they sound great (as you heard for yourself); a very smooth and bold sound. For recording and mastering my mixes, I use Wavelab 8.5. Wavelab 8.5 comes with a nice set of stock plugs, but again, I choose to go with my Waves plugs no matter what. Now, I’m not sure what your budget is, but these are some very expensive plugins (if you don’t buy them on sale), but they are the best on the market – I cannot even begin to express that more. My goal when I’m mastering my mixes is; not to branch away too much from the original sound, but make it smooth, loud, and stand out from anything else that’s out there. I want the listeners to enjoy every aspect of every song, every sound, every nuance, every transition to the fullest.

    #2361941
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    I’d like to add to all of you without a sound engineering background that good compression is an art-form! This is true for mix compression (as in mixing down a multitrack recording – which is relevant for producers, less so for DJs) and for mastering compression (and mastering is a specialty within the sound engineering community all on it’s own).

    Without wanting to discourage anyone, unless you are serious about this and willing to spend tons of time and learning (a fair bit of theoretical knowledge involved IF you want to make the best of those 500+ bucks software compressors), it’s better to stick with DJ-ing and spend your time in music discovery, technical skills and broadening your creative skills.

    Furthermore I’ll stick with the point of view I expressed in an earlier reply:
    “there is not much use in compressing something that is already compressed to 2-3 dB dynamic range when you get it. What are you gonna do, compress it down to 1dB?”
    As most EDM, house and other dance tracks are totally ready for the loudness wars, there is just no dynamic range on most any track you get these days. Flat pancakes don’t get much flatter and if they do, you have to ask what good it does.

    It’s your choice what you spend your precious time on, but as a DJ (producers is already different considerations), there are so many other things to master to become that great DJ besides compression, my advice would be to not bother.

    For the techies: I know that if you have tracks with varying dynamic range in your mix, using compression to bring them all at the same level as the most compressed track can be helpful to make the mix sound uniform and you can do it with further compressing the most compressed track. However this is not something you can do with a compressor preset and demands that you know what you are doing.

    Finally, on a personal note, I find overly compressed music to be more tiresome to listen too. It also increases damage to the hearing by raising the average sound level of a track to near the max sound level. Also tracks with more dynamic range (they are out there if you look for them) have a more “natural” or “alive” quality to them, imho.

    Again, as usual, just my three cents.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • The forum ‘The DJ Booth’ is closed to new topics and replies.