Home 2023 Forums DJing Software VDJ vs. Traktor

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #31096
    Terry_42
    Keymaster

    I agree with Hee in many points and I have used Traktor myself for a longo time and still do not hugely dislike it or anything. The main feature that is missing for me is parallel waveform and I cannot get “warmed up” with how some things work in Traktor. Hee is right that with the grid and that “indicator thing” above the decks (Traktor users prolly have a name for that white moving bar) you do not need the parallel waveform, but it is just more intuitive to me.

    Also VDJ is largely depending on 2 things:
    – You need the Pro Version for it to really shine and most people compare an LE version to traktor
    – You need a custom skin, the default is really bad and I can see why many people have problems with it

    Also you need a lot of time to make it do anything like you want it to, but you can… this can be an up or downside (for Hee it is a downside). For me, well I prolly move to Serato DJ once it is there…

    Then of course there is a cost factor. While Traktor licenses are cheap (nowadays anyway) usually NI lets you buy a new license once a new major version comes out. So either Serato or VDJ might be cheaper in the long run, as you get free updates for live.

    And last but not least there is broadcasting. For Internet Radio I will always use VDJ. I know you can setup Traktor/Serato with shoutcast or something, but the tight integration of broadcast with VDJ, broadcast routing directly in software etc. just makes me love VDJ for that kind of stuff. Maybe I give icecast with Serato a testdrive, but so far I really like the integration there…

    #31104
    Marcelo Neri
    Participant

    Hee Won Jung, post: 31195, member: 948 wrote: Traktor has a quantize feature…where it doesnt matter where in the track you goto it will always be right on beat. even without using the Sync button. So lets say you had track 1 playing…and u need to bring in Track 2…you start up track 2 line up your phase grid, and now both songs are beatmatch, but not phrase matched…as soon as song 1 hits the beginning of a 32 beat phrase, you hit your cue point on track 2 thats at the 1st beat of a 32 beat phrase and you are totally matched up with beat and in phrase

    Hee Won Jun, what you said is just to put songs in beatmatch and phrase matched. Ok! I can do this on Traktor but and then? How many beat jumps to “pull” the CUE point to the right place? See my point?
    And more:
    Still on VDJ, sometimes even matching those 1sts beats, and jumping by 16 beats (at a time), I just go closer, not accurate. So I got to keep beat jumping just one beat at a time time to “pull” the CUE point to the right place. Thanks to the overlapping wave forms I can fix it at time.
    That happens ’cause sometimes songs are not 4/4 (“quaternĂ¡rio” in latin), or whatever.
    I mean, in Traktor I didn’t see yet a 100% secure way to make this kind of advanced mixing technic without error…
    Thanks anyway.

    #31105
    DJimC
    Participant

    In VDJ you could add a sync command to all mappings of hot_cues, play buttons and other places where you would want to snap to the beatgrid after making a jump through the song. Of course, for this to work you need perfect beatgrids which requires a lot of preparation. But that would be necessary in traktor as well.

    #31107
    Marcelo Neri
    Participant

    DJimC, post: 31261, member: 2657 wrote: In VDJ you could add a sync command to all mappings of hot_cues, play buttons and other places where you would want to snap to the beatgrid after making a jump through the song. Of course, for this to work you need perfect beatgrids which requires a lot of preparation. But that would be necessary in traktor as well.

    Hey DJimC, thanks for replying!
    Once my beatgrids are ok (sometimes I use MixMeister Fusion to fix them). I just implement some CUE points and I’m ready to mix. I didn’t know we could snap things on VDJ. Have you got any tutorial about it by any chance?
    Each time I think Traktor is going to surprise me, VDJ is the one that does. lol

    #31109
    DJimC
    Participant

    you should take a look at the mapping of the buttons that you use for triggering your cue points. It most likely says something like ‘hot_cue 1’ for the button that triggers cue 1. If you change this to ‘hot_cue 1 & sync’ it will also sync your track after triggering cue 1 (this effect should be nearly instantaneous).

    #31111
    gullum
    Participant

    @Marcelo Neri
    Traktor can display the beat count 1.1.1 and you want to jump 16 beats thats 4 bars it would display 2.1.1 or you’d jump 32 beats you get 4.1.1. so you also get the beats counter like it’s ontop of most VDJ skins but unlike VDJ it also displays where in the phase it is. And no problem to have buttons for beatjump set to 16 beats and shift + same button to jump 1 beat.

    One more thing I like about Traktor if you use several computers you can beatgrid and set all your cue points when finished then lock it and if you open it on an other computer with traktor it will only need to analize the waveform but all cuepoints will be there.
    For us mac users that need to play on pioneer recordbox devices we have a program called Rekord buddy that can sync all you cue points from traktor to rekord box.

    VST is probable grate to have and actualy there is a VST with all the Traktor FX but the thing with VST is it uses extra resources and is not garantied to work with every software, they cost extra, the free once are not always tested on a wide scale.

    #31117
    Hee Won Jung
    Participant

    Marcelo Neri, post: 31260, member: 4405 wrote: Hee Won Jun, what you said is just to put songs in beatmatch and phrase matched. Ok! I can do this on Traktor but and then? How many beat jumps to “pull” the CUE point to the right place? See my point?
    And more:
    Still on VDJ, sometimes even matching those 1sts beats, and jumping by 16 beats (at a time), I just go closer, not accurate. So I got to keep beat jumping just one beat at a time time to “pull” the CUE point to the right place. Thanks to the overlapping wave forms I can fix it at time.
    That happens ’cause sometimes songs are not 4/4 (“quaternĂ¡rio” in latin), or whatever.
    I mean, in Traktor I didn’t see yet a 100% secure way to make this kind of advanced mixing technic without error…
    Thanks anyway.

    Okay i think you are missing what Quantizing really does.

    Here is my workflow: With Every song that i have I setup up Cue Points. Normally My cue points are as follows:
    First beat of into, 32 beats after first into, 1st breakdown(Chorus), The Drop(body), 2nd Breakdown, 2nd Drop, 64 beats before the end of the track, 32 beats before end of the track.

    This gives me a total of 8 cue points. If there are iconic pieces within the song i may not set cue points for the outtros and cue point the iconic pieces. I do this so that i can mix in at any point of a song, as well i can jump and do live edits on the fly, eg…I bring in the 1st breakdown…and as it is about to go into the Drop i cue point to the 2nd Drop, to cut out the first drop and will make my mixing into the track a lot easier.

    Now with Quantizing, what this does is…if your beatgrids are set properly, when i jump to ANY cue point i am still right on beat.

    Using this method you do not need to have your songs sync’ed as the quantize feature will keep your songs on beat once they are beat matched.
    After its just a matter of counting…when i know that the first track is coming to the 1st beat of 32 i will bring in song 2 by hitting the cue point that i already have set on the 1st beat.

    Now there are some tracks that may do some really off beat crap or drops not on a 32nd beat. This is where the beatjump feature is really handy…I can move up or down 1-32 beats depending on how much i am out of PHRASE.

    Beat = 1, Bar = 4 Beats, Phrase = 32 Beats

    If you need me to upload a video of this i can…but i think its pretty self explanatory.

    #31153
    ChrisGames
    Participant

    Im going to buy the Denon MC3000 its going to come with virtual DJ LE out of the box but would Traktor be a better fit for this controller or does it not matter?

    #31156

    the 3000 is more tightly integrated with VDJ ChrisGames

    #31221
    Marcelo Neri
    Participant

    Hee Won Jung, post: 31273, member: 948 wrote: If you need me to upload a video of this i can…but i think its pretty self explanatory.

    Hee Won Jung I beggin to understand your explanation, but I didn’t get it all. I don’t intend to exploit your good will of help and ask you to do a video, but…
    Whenever you’ll make a video for anybodyelse, please put also this explanation on it. You will solve 2 situations with just one video/work.
    Thank you very much.

    ps: I’m not receveing digitaldjtips’ mails when I topic I follow is replied.

    #31321
    DiBartdi
    Member

    I simply have both and use both. When im in need to display videos I simply use Virtual DJ. When I dont use videos and want better quality and more effects I just use Traktor.
    Basically if I want to entretain the crowd with music and videos: Virtual DJ
    If I want to entretain the crowd with music, effects and live remixes: Traktor

    #31411
    squarecell
    Participant

    I might be one of the few on here (along with DiBartdi) to own full versions of both and honestly, I have a hard time picking one over the other. I like the flexibility of VDJ, but Traktor is also very good. Plus it’s a lot cheaper.

    I also own Algoriddim’s djay. Who wants to talk about that?

Viewing 12 posts - 16 through 27 (of 27 total)
  • The forum ‘DJing Software’ is closed to new topics and replies.