Home 2023 Forums The DJ Booth using pitch +8 oldskool hardcore > jungle > dnb // happy hardcore

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2330991
    Happy Recycling
    Participant

    … p.s. the first question is more of a question of philosophy/custom. I figure the hardcore genres are pitched while the more smooth (namely, DnB) is not. Also, with time, DJ’s who play oldskool had to speed up to keep up, right? :\ The other question has to do with sound. Tracks just sound strange when their pitched up to +8, especially without keylock. But then again, I’m a n00b, and I’m figuring, if they are ALL pitched up to ~+8 then they wouldn’t. Would appreciate some advice.

    #2331141
    Terry_42
    Keymaster

    I never pitch up to +8 I think it is a stupid custom some DJs invented to have something cool, but it sounds bad.
    Actually keylock also can sound very bad over +5.

    I rarely use keylock, when it comes to harmonic mixing I have very good relative pitch (hearing) so I know how much shift I have if for example I pitched +3 for that song and just adjust the next song accordingly in my cans.

    Also it is a myth that you need to beatmatch anything, sometimes I want to go from 140 to 110 for a breather and no pitch fader in the world will make you beatmatch that.

    The thing you need is not advise on when to pitch and when not, it is experience, listening skills (hear pitch and key) and getting to know what sounds good for a crowd. These are most important skills for a DJ and they develop over time while training and actively listening to music.

    #2331341
    Happy Recycling
    Participant

    I would figure, yeah, some styles would sound horrible on +8. But … given the nature of the sounds of oldskool hardcore (chipmunk vocals, for example) and the entire reason why it’s called hardcore — faster = better, wouldn’t it make sense to pitch to +8? I’m sure there were other times where this “hardcore ideology” was used in record pitch. For instance, the reason why Richie Hawtin and John Aquaviva called their label +8 was because they were pitching records before their time to +8, right? I think they even alluded to the difference between “punk” techno (not directly) and sanitized house in Logical Nonsense, the bonus track on Dimension Intrusion. When asked the question “what’s the difference between house and techno?,” Richie said, “plus eight,” indicating a faster than supposed to “punk ideology” to their performances, which they did do back in the day from what I was reading in old newspaper clippings and books about the plastikman parties, which evolved from this punk aesthetic. I don’t think oldskool rave and breakbeat hardcore producers, even most jungle and happy hardcore producers back in the day would care but would in fact prefer their records to be played as fast as possible. As 2 Bad Mice were quoted, if I’m not mistaken it was them, “sampledelic,” just quick cuts into new tracks, back and forth on the cross fade, and I think the pitch was peaked for the same reason, most bang out which means shortest time. I figure right about until ’97/’98 pitch went down, and it did — trance is the obvious example, or 2-step predominating Drum and Bass giving it it’s modern and more lush less raw sound, this is mainstream underground music. The renegades such as planet-mu and others which stayed hardcore not just by name but by aesthetic, I would figure, kept their pitches up as high as possible reflecting their roots, as well as, their other roots, those of the b-boys, by how they construct their music, like Goldie said, to paraphrase, “boy’s aren’t about what they can do with a piece of equipment, but what they can’t do with it, and then pushing it to its boundaries.” The more melodic style out just don’t have this aesthetic/style/attitude it’s raw, and for most, that would mean going to a dodgy venue where they’d be constantly looking over their shoulder. Well, that was my time, anyway. Opinions? Am I onto something?

    #2331351
    Happy Recycling
    Participant

    Also, when it comes to the myth of beatmatching, it’s “sampledelic,” not only because of the samples lifted to make the tune but the tunes are edited on spot, like a drummer or turntablist, with quick cuts between records. That’s what KISS FM style of happy hardcore around 95 was like, so is oldskool jungle, so I’d figure, coming from the same origin, oldskool hardcore was the same. So it’s not so much about “beatmatching between tunes,” but laying one or more tune onto of the other so two “drum kits” are being spliced cut quickly one between the other in rhythm with the main tune, so matching is key or you’d hear a huge mess. Hardcore came from hip hop roots, and hip hop means DMC turntablists. While there was scratching involved with these records, Danny Breaks, 2 Bad Mice, and DJ Hype for instance are great examples of DJ’s who scratched hardcore (or darkcore into jungle) and there were happy hardcore counter parts who did the same, Spinback?, it was just as a common practice to splice/beatjuggle which required first to beatmatch to have “live sampledelia.” Am I right on this account too?

    #2331761
    Happy Recycling
    Participant

    Terry_42. You are right. +8 sounds horrible. Earlier today/yesterday I tested it out and it just sounds terrible. I wounder is there any merit to what I wrote in the two previous posts and that that’s why some DJ’s do this. I guess, what I have to learn is what the crowd wants, not what I want to do with the music I’m using … that’s the “next step” into becoming a good DJ. Thank you.

    #2332051
    deathy
    Participant

    Sure, what the crowd wants is important, but you have to be able to trust your ears, so if what the crowd wants sounds terrible to you, then you won’t be able to properly serve up the groove to them with that… you need to find something that sounds good to you that the crowd likes.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • The forum ‘The DJ Booth’ is closed to new topics and replies.