Traktor, Serato, Virtual DJ .. is it just me?
Home 2023 › Forums › DJing Software › Traktor, Serato, Virtual DJ .. is it just me?
- This topic has 27 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
Alchemy432.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 20, 2014 at 8:45 am #2012764
Alchemy432
Participantyup I’m a noob too, but my unit (G2V) just works better with VDJ, and as essentially they all do the exact same thing just with different layouts, VDJ PRO (LE is poo, imho) is all I need.
March 20, 2014 at 8:51 am #2012765DJ Vintage
ModeratorGood to see VDJ is working for you. I have to disagree that they all do the same thing and the only difference is layout. There are quite a few substantial differences that have a huge impact on workflow. Being new to the game, you might not have gotten to the point where that matters. As indeed, they all let you load tracks, change speed, mix them and throw in the odd FX or two.
But take it from an old hand, there are serious differences between software.
And yes, LE and Intro versions of DJ software are only good to have something to install when you unpack your controller for the first time and getting your feet wet.
Greetinx.
March 20, 2014 at 10:54 am #2012813Alchemy432
ParticipantI can haz elaboration Plz?
I’m very intrigued to learn what sort of things you have found to be important differences?
say between VDJ Pro and what you prefer to use instead? I’m a noob but not afraid of doing the work & research to understand whatever you say which might go over my head, it can only make me a better DJ so by all means, I’d love to hear your thoughts.While I’m still getting used to the G2V, VDJ Pro works better for me as the Traktor mapping available for G2V is confusing, requiring you to use buttons labelled completely differently on the unit, to the functions being controlled within Traktor, and I haven’t been successful in my own attempts at mapping thus far.
Also I’ve already spent a week scanning the 49,000+ songs in my library for BPM using VDJ, and started working on sets; and when I tried scanning for BPM with Traktor, despite it adding the info to a different part of the ID3 tag, VDJ reads that BPM info instead of its own (located in a txt file created by VDJ, so I assumed wouldn’t conflict with ID3 tags) and its stuffs up all my work as the two BPM figures given are different from VDJ to Traktor, and all my cue points disappear.
That said, amongst the DJ’s I’ve spoken to on the topic, the majority swear by Traktor. So despite a steeper learning curve, having to re-scan my library, redo my sets from scratch and an awkward mapping for my controller, I may switch to traktor upon understanding some of the finer points about the two.
Look forward to hearing back from ya,
Peace!March 20, 2014 at 11:23 am #2012823Terry_42
KeymasterI have to say that VDJ Pro is an excellent software and very underrated by some pros (some pros use it), as waaaaay back years ago it was more toy like. But it has since become a top notch software and is in my opinion even more configurable than Traktor (actually that is a fact). However to the config it has a huge learning curve as VDJ scripting is not an easy task…
Nonetheless before Serato was released for my Terminal Mix, I DJed with VDJ Pro all the time and actually modded the Mapping for my Terminal Mix to suit my style. I think it worked really well and I liked to use it.
The only things that got me to use Serato over VDJ:
– Tighter integration of jogwheels, yes with tuning (I even wrote a tuning article) VDJ can come close, but still…
– iZotope Effects. VDJ has some nice effects, but some lack in sound quality.
– Not all addons work on Macs as VDJ is developed in Windows and then ported
– Overall user experience in Serato for my workflowBut most of this are personal preferences and VDJ is just fine to work with.
March 20, 2014 at 1:27 pm #2012852dannyboyex@gmail.com
ParticipantI agree with Terry that the jogwheel integration is tighter and that the effects can be terrible. The last point is a little subjective because it’s up to you what works. Still it’s easier to go from vdj to serato than vdj to traktor imo
March 20, 2014 at 2:43 pm #2012907Alchemy432
Participant@ Terry & Mista Clean,
Thanks for the feedback, funnily enough Serato is the one I haven’t used yet. as for Traktor… I did wonder if the Traktor love was much like the Pro Tools love, like how I’d ask why pro tools was better and people would say “its the industry standard” which really doesn’t mean anything.
VDJ FX –
the quality of the fx (beatgrid, flange, phase, doubler, etc) in VDJPro really don’t bother me at all, maybe because I haven’t played live & only heard them through the monitor speakers & headphones in my studio rather then a proper PA system, or even maybe because of my background as a producer, I can tweak them to get acceptable results and don’t mind that they require that tweaking to sound decent? I guess I’ll have to try these iZotope fx and do a comparison.What does bug the hell out of me and hopefully I can find an option to configure things differently, is having a list of a fx, that I have to scroll through to get to the one I want, even with rapid clicking of the button on my controller, its stressful when you change from one effect to another 5 effects away with only half a bar of music to do it in.. >_< I haven’t explored the others or even VDJ enough yet but it would be great to have the ability to load a selection of fx into a list for each song on each deck, that loads automatically when you load song, or even to be able to hotkey fx to buttons on a controller. even if that meant buying another small controller with an array of performance pads to use as hotkeys or something like that, I’d be happy with that.
JOGWHEELS-
jogwheel integration, At the moment I literally only use the jogwheel for setting cue points before I start mixing, or finding a good place to drop while mixing if I have no cue points setup already, and nudging the track along if they aren’t bpm matched or have fluctuating tempos, and I haven’t had any trouble with the ‘tightness’ or responsiveness of the wheels with VDJ for these uses…is it because you’re scratching? I don’t like the VDJ fx for brake, backspin or scratch, theres lag and sluggishness and the fx sound pretty bad.. I assumed that was the case with all midi controller decks and for digital battle scratching and the like you’d need the turntables with the scratch control vinyl and scratch wares…? planned on buying one of these down the track…I’ll see if any of my dj mates have serato I can play with for a bit and give it a go, I did find Traktor a pretty alien interface when I first saw it, still do; but after talking with u guys about all this I think I’ll stick with VDJPro for the time being, I still have alot to learn anyway 🙂
Peace
March 20, 2014 at 3:37 pm #2012953Terry_42
Keymaster@ Mista Clean: Indeed spot on, the last remarks were purely subjective as it is my own workflow and if yours is different I always say “whatever floats your boat”.
I totally agree with the “industry standard” thing. I never liked Pro Tools and I only ever used Logic and Ableton… does not make me a bad person I guess hehe
The F/X part, well iZotope effects are surely less “fancy” as some effects in VDJ (aka you can definately do more wild things that with the Serato F/X), what I like about them is, that I love to use subtle F/X. Like enhance a chorus with a slight delay and reverb. Make a ping pong delay setup so I can more easy transition between BPM changes, filter just a tad to get the new bass in more smoothly etc. etc. etc.
Now what the Serato F/X do there for me is, that most people do not even notice when I use those effects, as they sound so good in quality when they alter the original signal, that it sounds totally seamless. They sound like they belong in the song and that is great for me. Also I used iZotope F/X plugins a lot in production and know how they compare to others and loved them in production also.
Scrolling fast through the F/X in Serato is quite easy and I use a nanopad that I mapped for F/X and samples to do that…As for the jogs. Yes the main advantage is when scratching. However scratching with VDJ is still OK, it is just some more complicated scratches that I find easier to pull off in Serato (not that I am that good a scratcher).
Also I mostly beatmatch manually, not because I dislike the sync button, but simply I always did so since the days of vinyl and hence I am used to it. So I am a real nudge nudge type, as I do not beatmatch exactly to a point but rather to a point what I consider “good enough” and then nudge it through the transition easily… and if the whole thing behaves more like a turntable (which the Terminal Mix plus Serato does nicely) it is more suited for my workflow.Also I totally agree VDJ to Serato is kinda easy transition wise. I had a hard time swtiching away from Traktor actually as I could not belief how easy some things go.
March 20, 2014 at 7:12 pm #2013061dannyboyex@gmail.com
Participant@Alchemy if you want to activate effects faster you might want to consider mapping individual ones to the keyboard or controller buttons. I found Traktor harder to select effects compared to VDJ. If you’re not doing any intense scratching then vdj is perfectly capable. I used VDJ too so if you need any help mapping, let me know.
March 20, 2014 at 11:21 pm #2013203aiRy ellis
ParticipantThanks for your reply’s!
So, I don’t use Itunes, or Ableton, not into scratching so much (at least for now) … from points you guys made.
I’ve been wanting to know why some people put VDJ down so much. So thank you all!
I just did my 2nd live set at a party few nights ago for around 100 ppl. I have a Mitrack Pro 2, and got the skin for it for VDJ. I guess more effects would be cool (but then again, I sometimes have too much fun with them as it is lol)… but for my skill level, what I want to do atm, I find VDJ so much user friendly. On Traktor and Setaro, it was just a pain in the ass finding songs lol. That was the first thing that turned me off.
March 21, 2014 at 6:21 am #2013334Alchemy432
Participant@airyellis,
just in case you weren’t aware, there are user fx on the VDJ website, hundreds of them, probably half just variations on the stock fx, with extra config options, or extra elements to the sound itself. they’re free to download. If you make a strong coffee and put aside an hr or so, you can get them all in one hit then load up say 10 at a time to VDJ to try them out.
@terry
I use sync extensively, so VDJ will be fine 🙂
however when VDJ beat maps inaccurately and the beat indicators on the waveform display are offbeat, I kind of prefer it this way, because I can use sync to get it close, then use my ears to indicate when to drop rather then the graphics which are often off beat, likewise if I have to use the visual for whatever reason, I prefer to use the transient spike of the waveform as my reference. probably a bit of a strange way to do things but works for me at the mo’. as for izotope fx, based on what you’ve said, i’m gonna stick with VDJ, it stores your adjustments, and as such I can tweak (for e.g.) the abrasive flanger sound to something more subtle, I too prefer the subtle enhancements, especially when applied to a song as apposed to just a drum loop or acapella. except the beat juggling ones.. slice that sh*t up! 😀
@mista,
thanks for the tips! not keen on the keyboard mapping, not enough buttons on my controller for extra mapping, but I’ll be getting a cheap midi controller thats small and can sit next to my G2V for fx mapping, and I’ll get in contact again if I need help setting it up 🙂 other advantage of a separate controller, is when I’m not using it for djing, I can trigger drum machines when I’m producing tunesThanks again guys,
Peace!March 23, 2014 at 4:26 am #2014922dannyboyex@gmail.com
Participant@siryellis im right with you on that!
@alchemy i can suggest an akai lpd8. they go pretty cheap nowadays. I used to have one but i gave it as a gift to my producer friend.
March 23, 2014 at 1:14 pm #2015403Alchemy432
Participant@Mista, Cheers bud!
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘DJing Software’ is closed to new topics and replies.