Home 2023 Forums Digital DJ Gear Serious advice needed.

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2047318
    jonnysimpson
    Participant

    Also forgot to mention, with the TT route, I’d be happy to go with some Technics alternatively. Be wary however I don’t have a big record collection, and so would therefore would prefer to source my music digitally via my laptop. I have no idea how I would connect the two either. My budget in total as well, is just a little over £2000 for anyone who needs to do some maths on some recommendations.

    #2047323
    Hulmeman
    Participant

    I’ve got an NS7 II, and plan on getting some TTs. I’ve done some research, but don’t feel I’m qualified to advise you? I got some great pointers from a lot of very knowledgeable DJs on the forum. Vintage, Marco and Terry to name a few. These guys really know their stuff!

    #2047324
    jonnysimpson
    Participant

    What prompts you to make that switch when you already have motorized platters on the NS7 ii? Just more authenticity and size, I guess, with a compromise to functionality?

    I’ve done loads of research and don’t seem to be getting anywhere. Because the SZ is quite new, there’s not many people comparing it to CDJ set ups, let alone TT set ups.

    #2047346
    Marco Solo
    Participant

    My first question is what are you trying to get out of the gear that you’re not getting on your SX? If you want something that feels more like a club setup the Denons are a great choice. Very well equipped with a much better price tag than the Pioneers. You do miss the functionality of Rekordbox, but that’s not a big problem if you’re looking into 850’s. The 850’s are in kind of a sweet spot if you look at the Pioneer lineup. Not much more expensive than 350’s, but quite near a 900 which is a lot more expensive.

    I personally wouldn’t go for an SZ as it’s not really that much different than what you already have. It’s just bigger, has coloured pads and a hardware fx unit. The rest is almost the same, except that it costs twice as much and will be a pain to carry around and to set up. You can look on youtube for reviews that talk about comparing it to the SX.
    Now that we’re talking about controllers, the DVS route would be the most expensive route with the least features, remember that. You need a mixer that’s certified for your software you want to use or use a certified soundcard with a non-certified mixer. Then you use control vinyl for turntables or control cd’s for CDJ’s.
    I’m not too fond of the Pioneer turntable, it doesn’t have anything over the other super OEMs on the market right now. All of these are based on the Technics, they’re all the same underneath. Except for the price tag…
    Going for CDJ’s with software controlling them (HID or not) would be a waste of money in my eyes as you already have a setup that feels like a CDJ setup with much more capabilities. Sure you can add something like a Kontrol X1 Mk2 for effects, but what’s the point?

    #2047353
    Hulmeman
    Participant

    I want the authentic vinyl feel that you just don’t get with the NS7 II, despite the spinning platters. Don’t get me wrong the NS7 II is a fantastic bit of kit, but for me it’s more of a personal thing I guess. Am I making any sense? I’ve not been anywhere near a TT in about 4-5 years, and I was blown away when I saw/researched the NS7 II. That said, after having it for a little over a month, I yearn for a real 12″ TT? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t hate the NS7 II and will continue to use it. I just won’t be complete till I have a DVS TT setup. I plan on getting a couple of TTs and connecting them up to the NS7 II to begin with.

    #2047356
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    DDJ-SZ
    I’ve been an SX user previously. Despite it’s high price tag, the SZ offers some home comforts in it’s build, such as the CDJ sized jog wheels, the adjustable features for them, and the SX’s features which made it such a power house such as the pads, standalone mixer and ease of the use. For this option, I would see it almost as if I was buying a pair of CDJs and mixer, without the USB, CD and HID features. The transition would feel very smooth as well.

    Unlike Marco, I can see some reasons to go to the SZ, especially with you toying with the idea of getting full size players anyway and possibly going the DVS route. The SZ is – size-wise pretty much identical to the 2000 nexus players. As is the mixer section (although the FX are a bit different, which to me makes sense as you have two full FX channels from within the software you are using), which is very close to DJM900 layout and size. If you can work with the SZ, there will be not much problems to handle a full club gear when playing out. Obviously (far) less features and you’ll need to prepare your tracks and playlists in RekordBox, other than that no real surprises. The dual soundcard allows you to hook up two turntables and go DVS (Digital Vinyl System) without the need for an extra external soundcard.

    Denon SC3900
    After doing tonnes of research, these bad boys seem like the defined route to go down if I wanted CDJs. At a lower cost, with almost identical functionality to the CDJs, I fail to see why anyone would not go for these over anything Pioneer CDJ related. The motorized platters also add a touch of flair. At the same time though, I have minimal/little experience with CDJs. Is there a catch here?

    First of all, I am a Denon fan, so all my comments are slightly tainted on this topic :-). The 3900s are awesome units. I have the 2900s which are essentially the same but with static platters. Playing with motorised platters takes some practice and although I think it is fun, I am so used to static platters now, I don’t want to bother switching. Besides, the chance of running into a set of motorised platter players out in clubs is slight to none. They compare to the 2000s with only a few (in my eye minor) features missing). Obviously they will integrate well with most DJ software (except Serato if I am not mistaken) to be nice midi-compatible controllers. If you want to use them as stand-alone players, you’ll have to prepare your usb-stick with Engine (RekordBox for Denon so to speak). And if you play out, you’d have to do the same for Pioneer players in RekordBox. There is no catch, imho. Denon has always made top-quality gear at affordable prices. Pioneer is the marketing winner though and it shows in the brand-bonus you pay for wanting their logo on gear.

    Pioneer CDJ 850-Ks
    These guys would cost 200 extra than the Denon’s. As being marked within the club industry standard – Pioneer’s entry level baby as it were, and with such sustainable resale value, I felt these deserved a place in my short list. However, the lack of features, the added cost over the SZ and the Denon’s has put me in a spot of bother. Why would you get these over the latter above? What makes these special, what am I really paying for extra here?

    At 200 more than the Denon’s you get less features and (biased opinion follows) lesser build quality and no motorised platters. I’d consider it a big step down in features if you don’t use them in combination with DJ software. And even then you’d be missing out on stuff like cue point buttons and such.

    PLX 1000s
    Alongside being open to learn on CDJs, turntables is something that I’ve been gradually becoming more and more interested in over the past year. As we don’t much about these, there is little to really distinguish them from a pair of 1200s, or 1210s. But as they’re just being released in 2014, as oppose to Panasonic’s post millennium releases, it is a fair judgement to think they would raise the bar a little. Can I use these with my laptop, as I would with CDJs/controllers? Is there an added cost if I was going to not go with a controller, such as a piece of hardware that I would have to incorporate into my set up?

    Frankly, I have said on the blog that they either bought the plans from Technics or reverse-engineered the SL1200s. They are so identical, it’s scary. Again with the brand-bonus they are at the high end of the budget spectrum. And while you can integrate them in a Digital (laptop) DJ setup by using them as DVS system, it requires either a certified mixer or external soundcard (except in the case of the DDJ-SZ) to work. And there is NO midi connectivity whatsoever.

    My experience
    All controller related. I want to move onto bigger and better things. Bigger, tastier and more professional gear. I want to do gig on CDJs and feel comfortable of them. But after doing tonnes of research, I have come to some sort of evaluation that the SZ almost emulates what CDJs would feel like. They would also be cheaper than say, getting a pair of CDJs and a mixer, alongside a rane box. Why would I get CDJs over it? What’s the main selling point?
    Suggestions, advice, experience is greatly appreciated. As you all know, DJing is an expensive hobby, and when you’re just on the edge with what you can spend, you always want to make an investment that you’ll never regret.

    Let me tackle these points in order:
    Bigger, tastier and more professional. You are selling the SX short as it is pretty much the professional workhorse from Pioneer. The SZ being the flagship, it is -imho- made primarily to make it as easy as possible for CDJ DJs to migrate to digital (by offering them the almost identical touch and feel as a 2000/900 nexus setup). Since you are already a controller DJ, this would be less important to you.

    CDJ emulation. Yes, as a matter of fact, any jogwheel based controller emulates a CDJ, since a CDJ is nothing but a mediaplayer with a display, a jogwheel and a few buttons to perform some functions. I increasingly fail to see the fear some people seem to have for CDJs. We went from vinyl to CDJ to (now) controller, meaning more features as technology progressed. CDJs are the PREVIOUS technology, so if you can handle a controller, you can handle CDJs. I am not saying there isn’t a little transition to do (not in the least learning to live without cue point buttons for example 😀 ), but nothing half an hour of practice wouldn’t solve in my opinion.

    Unless you are dead-set on doing DVS/Vinyl (and don’t forget there is a rather steep upkeep cost for vinyl, going up to as much as 150 a month!) and you don’t really need the extra features the SZ offers, I’d actually recommend keeping the SX. I always advice people wanting to get a CDJ setup to just rent one midweek for a few days (usually at a nice discount as it hardly gets rented during the week). At the end of that you’ll either say “I want this because it feels better than a controller/my SX” or you’ll say “well, I know how this works and if I run into it in a venue, I know how to work with it, but I will stick with my controller”.

    Hope that helps some.

    #2047396
    jonnysimpson
    Participant

    First of all I’ll start by saying I appreciate all the feedback I’ve gotten from you guys.

    My ambition to move from controller -> CDJ is fuelled by the fact that clubs use CDJs. The tag of being that club and industry standard.

    I understand that the SX emulates this setting in reasonable manner, however, I feel reduced size of the thing and the fact that I am accustomed to looking at my laptop quite a bit doesn’t quite cut it, especially when I want to become more approachable to managers and owners alike. I also feel as though I would prefer having a generally bigger set up, which mirrors that of a club set up. It would feel more professional and solid. Portability is not an issue, as I don’t plan to take things to a mobile basis anytime soon. I also happen to have, as mentioned at the start of the thread, quite a bit of disposable income to raise the bar to the next level before I get back to being a poor student, and am keen to invest more money into my passion. Let’s rule out any economical stand point of the topic, aside from my budget.

    In addition, contrary to what I said about sourcing my music via my laptop, I am more than happy to migrate to using USBs. In this respect, I wouldn’t even have to use a laptop to even practice on, and gigs would be stupidly easily to do. It’s easy to say ‘don’t look at the screen when practising, then you’ll know what CDJing is like!’, but because I started by using controllers, the laptop is all I know, it’d be nice to eradicate it from my set up. I’d love to transition my abilities and talents into a more traditional style of DJing if I am completely honest. The CDJs I would buy say, would sit in my room, and would be used to make me feel home in this environment – so as mentioned earlier, portability would no way shape or form be a factor.

    I’ve been having a look at the 900s recently. Main things I’ve picked up on is that they can accurately loop (a feature I use A LOT on my SX), have a generally good enough display, and I think even a slip mode. Obviously the Denons are still in the ball park by far, the motorized platters on those are ever so enticing. Having talked to a few people I know, they don’t seem to up talk Denon in any way shape or form. I’m guessing this is because Pioneer are at the top of the market and that’s all they know? And what extra features do they have over the 850s, Vintage?

    I guess the only reason I’d pick the 850/900 over the SC3900 is due to the fact that I’ve virtually seen 0 Denon players in my 4 years of clubbing, and so therefore would feel like a lacklustre investment if the purpose is to ‘feel at home’ on traditional club players.

    And like mentioned, the reason the SZ comes into the mix (no pun intended) is because, as you guys have mentioned, it is like pretty much having a nexus with a few fancy unnecessary features. Oh, and it’s a hell of a lot cheaper than any of the other as well. But again, this contradicts my ambition to DJ without a laptop.

    It’s safe to say we’ve scribbled out the TT option on my list guys, almost there now!

    #2047397
    jonnysimpson
    Participant

    Although, having a look online, there seems to be a lot of mixed opinions on 850 vs 900. Any exposition here?

    #2047401
    Terry_42
    Keymaster

    I am sorry to say this but:

    If you have full control over the DDJ-SX and can do everything with it that it provides and you are unable to translate this directly to ANY CDJ setup a club could offer, then you are doing something very wrong.

    The SX already has all the controls very similar to any Nexus setup (yes the SZ is a bit closer, but to anyone who has mastered the SX it won’t matter).
    Preparing songs in rekordbox also is nothing you need CDJs for, just a computer that buggy software and USB sticks.

    If one would be really really unsure an hour long training session on a clubs setup can probably solve anything (again if you have already mastered the SX and all transitions and mixing techniques).

    I mean honestly with most CDJ setups below the Nexus line you will have a step backwards anyways.
    If you have already mastered driving a Ferrari how difficult is driving a Volkswagen? (except the lack of power you might feel…)

    Of course all you did until now is drive the Ferrari in first gear in a parking lot, then driving a volkswagen can be challenging again…

    #2047403
    jonnysimpson
    Participant

    I guess it’s a confidence issue. A stubbornness I need to get out of my head.

    In any case then, I may roll with the SZ for the pure luxury then (the size which is one of the biggest deal makers for me, added resale value which is important in controllers etc).

    Feel free to admit that, are you suggesting that if I could CDJs then I’d regret it?

    & how hard is it to prepare USBs for the club CDJs?

    Cheers again for the discussion guys, this helping my mind to be pointed in the right direction!

    #2047415
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    Hi,

    I use Mixvibes Cross as DJ software and it has a one-way sync to recordbox. So I do all my stuff in Cross, then hit sync, go to RB, choose what I want on my stick and prepare my stick. With the new version of RB you can do something similar if you are using iTunes as your primary library management. There are some sync options with iTunes now.

    Preparing is relatively easy. I always carry around a memory stick with both RB and Engine prepared music. Never know where you end up right.

    If size matters (and trust me when I say I can relate, I have 2900s for a reason too), the SZ would be a nice way of getting there without having to forgo all the features the SX offers you. Since it’s a standalone mixer too and money doesn’t seem to be an option, you could add one or two CDJs and play around with those a while to really understand what it is we are trying to tell you. I don’t know how it is where you are, but here there are a few places that offer long term rent/lease (1 month and up) on DJ gear. So I’d get a set of players for a month, hook them up to your SZ. At the end of the month you’ll know what you really want/need.

    More and more very professional DJs show up at clubs with a laptop. It’s no longer a sign of non-professionalism and, quite frankly, I have to see that once the now standard Pioneers sets are written off venues will reinvest heavily in new CDJ-style gear. More likely is that they will just provide a good PA with a house mixer and expect DJs to bring their own gear, which in most cases probably will be controllers or a modular setup. I may be wrong, but I don’t see venues spending another 5-6K on stuff while DJ’s come in and use the Pioneers to stick a controller on top of (have seen this happen, a 500 USD controller on top for 5000USD worth of Pioneer gear LOL – I don’t advise ever doing that, most likely will p*ss off the owner in a major way). Since the write-off on gear like this is usually in the 10+ years, it will surely be a while though.

    Final note on laptop use. I too had some issues of looking at the laptop too much in the beginning. But now it’s back to browsing (which is the equivalent of going through your record/cd case with your head down, so really no difference), the occassional glance at the waveform (which I used to look at even with vinyl – you could actually “see” the different parts on a record) and for the rest it’s using the buttons on a controller. It really is about practice. Sticking some strategically placed pieces of cardboard on your laptop screen CAN cure of lot of those things.

    Hope that helps

    #2047416
    Marco Solo
    Participant

    What I see in venues (especially the more techno ones) is that platters are getting smaller or go out of the picture all together. Look at setups that Chris Liebing, Dubfire and Richie Hawtin are using. There are no platters at all. I’ve seen open air events where they provide a Xone 4D with some CDJ’s and the guys only bring their laptop with some modular controllers and never even turn on the CDJ’s.
    Going CDJ because clubs use them is becoming less and less of an argument to use them. I like the idea of Vintage to just rent some for a midweek and see them for yourself. That will probably cure your curiosity for CDJ’s, they are not that different from what you’re doing now.

    But if you really want something, by all means go for it. It’s your money 😉

    By the way, Vintage, the turntables all look exactly like 1200’s because the ARE exactly like 1200’s. Including the Pioneer by the looks of things. Look up the term ‘super OEM’.

    #2047430
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    I personally can’t imagine a (DJ) life without jogs/platters. Being a mobile DJ probably probably prompts a few different requirements. And if you have to do ANY serious manual beatmatching, I don’t see that happen with an X1 or something 😀

    Yep, rental is good. A local DJ school is even better. Two hours with someone that knows this gear intimately, 30 minutes of instruction (there are a few odd things that are easy to learn once you know them, that you don’t want to find out yourself) and 90 minutes of supervised practicing (if the school is any good they’ll give you tasks to perform). It’s 100 bucks more than well spent imho.

    I agree with many of the super-oems looking suspiciously like 1200s. Lot of them HAVE taken the trouble to add at least a modicum of personal touch. Be it a straight tone-arm, different size/color/shape buttons, stuff like that.
    The Pioneers have nothing to distinguish them from the originals, bar the blue instead of red light for the strobe (which I like less than the red, my personal thing though).

    #2047503
    Terry_42
    Keymaster

    Indeed. Safe the money and train with the SX until you know it by heart.
    Then simply rent a Nexus setup for 2 days which will prolly run you below 100 bucks and you will be fluent with where some buttons have moved.

    Preparing for CDJs is a non-issue. I prepare my playlists in iTunes anyways and both Serato and Rekordbox do import them.
    Then I load my playlists into Rekordbox and let it do its analysing thing.
    When the first songs are analysed I update the CUE points and Loop points quickly and be done with it.
    For a 2 hour set in a big club this involves prolly 2 hour prep work (and I am really picky about my CUEs).

    However since even a Nexus setup can do less than my controller, in 90% of all cases I pack my controller and set it up in a venue, or in case of a large venue they usually have a technician who will set your stuff up. Many even ask in advance now if you bring a controller(s) and plan their booth accordingly. (Especially at festivals this is typical as there could be 10 or more DJ setups in the same booth and they need to know how to switch quickly…. I once had like 15 controllers on a festival stand…)

    #2047538
    DJ Vintage
    Moderator

    +1 for what Terry said.

    <whispers at OP> But DO get the SZ. I am sure you’ll like it!

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • The forum ‘Digital DJ Gear’ is closed to new topics and replies.