Buying music from iTunes
Home 2023 › Forums › The DJ Booth › Buying music from iTunes
- This topic has 17 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 13 years, 4 months ago by
backtothefront.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 18, 2012 at 8:42 pm #32123
Fxn-L
MemberI can’t confirm if this is a thing or not. However, I can confirm that 66.6% of all DJs I personally know are filthy pirates and play their stuff live anyway.
November 18, 2012 at 9:37 pm #32125Steve Turner
MemberYeah I gathered there would be quite a few pirate DJs out their in this day and age; obviously not a route I want to go down of course!
Still I don’t wanna get told off by the boys upstairs for playing iTunes music live when I’m not really allowed too!
November 19, 2012 at 12:13 am #32131Maximlee
Blockedthe reason i wouldnt buy tunes of itunes is… its only 256kps rather than 320. I cant say for 100%… but as far as i know if you purchase music…you can do what you want with it but you cant resell it.
November 19, 2012 at 2:36 am #32134Groschi
ParticipantI wouldn’t really worry about quality at iTunes. AAC is a younger and more advanced format than mp3 and files bought from iTunes (~256 kbit/s average bitrate, slightly varying) should compare very well to Lame –v0 (that’s how amazon, emusic and many others encode their files) or 320kbit/s mp3 files.
Actually, blind listening tests done some time ago by the hydrogenaudio community have shown that all common audio codecs in VBR mode (even crappy wma) are sufficent to reach transparency at reasonable average bitrates of 200-320 kbps.Edit by Moderator:
Sorry offtopic ranting removed. We do not support ranting like that. You can always express your opinions, but please start a new thread if you like (not offtopic hijack another) and watch the language and stay polite.November 19, 2012 at 5:11 am #32140Dayvue
MemberGroschi, post: 32290, member: 3845 wrote: I wouldn’t really worry about quality at iTunes. AAC is a younger and more advanced format than mp3 and files bought from iTunes (~256 kbit/s average bitrate, slightly varying) should compare very well to Lame –v0 (that’s how amazon, emusic and many others encode their files) or 320kbit/s mp3 files.
Actually, blind listening tests done some time ago by the hydrogenaudio community have shown that all common audio codecs in VBR mode (even crappy wma) are sufficent to reach transparency at reasonable average bitrates of 200-320 kbps.
November 19, 2012 at 6:03 am #32144Groschi
ParticipantWhoops, i guess you’re right in sensing something fishy about my last statement. After searching the forums and wiki for those particular test results it turns out they must’ve been merely a product of my imagination (or bad memory…).
I fucked up on that one, sorry. And thanks for pointing that out to me. It’s already been some years since i read up on all that stuff and i must have mixed up some things.November 19, 2012 at 8:22 am #32154Terry_42
KeymasterYou are not wrong Groschi.
Actually the sound quality (see Frauenhofer site) of 256kps AAC is dynamically slightly better than 320kps mp3, but yes blind listener tests did not reveal any difference.
However 50% is always believing in what you do and some people feel only comfy with wav… it will always be like that and there are numerous threads about it.For me: I buy music on iTunes all the time.
November 19, 2012 at 10:02 am #32166Steve Turner
MemberYeah I have heard the sound quality of the 256 AAC iTunes is pretty much identical to the standard 320 mp3s, so I am not too worried about that.
Looks like the iTunes store will be my go to for my tunes then!
November 20, 2012 at 12:46 am #32208DJ 2 Cut
MemberiTunes is a wonderful place to buy music. Their selection could be better for DJ’s though. I always recommend beatport as you get a lot of selection aimed at DJ’s specifically.
November 20, 2012 at 1:15 pm #32233rfb
MemberI don’t know man, just yesterday I got some pretty unpopular / “undergroundy” deep house tracks off of itunes.
I can’t tell a difference between beatport 320 and itunes tracks, so I usually go for iTunes as Beatport is more expensive, even with a coupon code.
November 20, 2012 at 3:24 pm #32245Coltrane09
ParticipantSteve Turner, post: 32277, member: 4363 wrote: Hey guys,
I have just started my DJ journey and am beginning to amass my music library.
However I am a bit un-certain on where to buy my music from. I have heard of sites like Beatport & Juno but was planning on buying the majority of my music from iTunes due to it being a bit cheaper until I heard that mixing music live in a club for example with iTunes purchased music was illegal due to some legal mumble jumble and that I could only use music purchased from DJ sites like Beatport.
Sounds a bit wierd but is this true?
Don’t want to spend hundreds only to find out I can’t play it live… ;(
Cheers
Steve, maybe this will answer your original question: SOURCE
November 20, 2012 at 6:28 pm #32255DJ 2 Cut
MemberYea as “EDM” (hate that name) becomes more and more popular im sure iTunes will for sure open up more. And I agree i cant really tell the difference either in quality.
November 20, 2012 at 8:54 pm #32273Maximlee
Blockedrfb, post: 32389, member: 2662 wrote: I don’t know man, just yesterday I got some pretty unpopular / “undergroundy” deep house tracks off of itunes.
I can’t tell a difference between beatport 320 and itunes tracks, so I usually go for iTunes as Beatport is more expensive, even with a coupon code.
its really mad cau alot of people talk about wav beening to expensive and itunes having cheaper tracks… 10-15 years ago when people earned far far less… they had to pay on average £6 for a vinyl now they dont want to pay £1.30… were is the sense in that?
November 20, 2012 at 9:03 pm #32274Ess Jay
MemberMaximlee, post: 32429, member: 2165 wrote: its really mad cau alot of people talk about wav beening to expensive and itunes having cheaper tracks… 10-15 years ago when people earned far far less… they had to pay on average £6 for a vinyl now they dont want to pay £1.30… were is the sense in that?
Times change. Just because you spend more on something, does not make it necessarily better. Buying more expensive songs, for no justifiable reason other than to say “I pay more for my songs” makes no sense to me. For the vast majority of people, money is not an endless quantity, so people save where they can… Or is it just me that sees the sense in that?
November 20, 2012 at 9:07 pm #32275rfb
Member+1
–
The average beatport track is € 1,56, after adding German GST it’s € 1,85 (= GBP 1,50). A more recent/popular tune ways in at € 2,58 after GST. Now, assuming that you don’t hear any difference in quality (I know I don’t): Would you pay 2,58, or a maximum of 1,29 for the EXACT same thing? With the money saved, I can buy more tunes, go to clubnights, go to concerts…
–
That aside: What is the use of citing how things were in the past? I don’t know dude, 50 years ago people paid to send other people letters. I don’t blame them for sending an email for free in the present.But even THAT’s not the point. The point is simple micro-economics: offer and demand.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘The DJ Booth’ is closed to new topics and replies.