Advice on speaker purchase – non-professional DJ
Home 2023 › Forums › Digital DJ Gear › Advice on speaker purchase – non-professional DJ
- This topic has 16 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by
Dic Gleason.
-
AuthorPosts
-
October 18, 2015 at 1:38 am #2278051
bob6397
ParticipantFirstly – I would match the brand of your tops and subs if possible. They are designed to be used together and therefore nearly always sound better..
Secondly – I have used the KSubs’s being used at an event and they are really good. It just so happens that the KW181’s beat just about any comparable single-18 driver sub on the market in terms of volume and sound.
Thirdly – on to the tops – I have used 2 x K10’s (without a sub) being used in a medium sized room no problem – they filled it well. The bass when “DEEP” is enabled makes it sound and almost feel like you have a sub in the system as well. It sounds like a pair of 15″ drivers if I’m honest. The volume when they were in External Sub Mode was incredible as well – so if you paired them with a sub (Either a KSub or KW181) then it would sound awesome.
I’m not too sure if the K8’s would be big enough really to get to the volumes you need to match a sub.. The frequencies however would work as the tops have the crossover built in, not the subs. This means that it should always work when used with QSC subs…
Finally – The ULTRANET speaker system is the first of it’s kind and therefore probably not as good as it can be. And when you are only running 2 speakers (and possibly a sub), the difference between using Cat 5E cable and XLR cable is nothing. I would stick to the XLR’s for now and have a bigger choice on which speakers to buy. Reviews on the Turbosound speakers are few and far between as well, whereas the K12’s are now pretty much Hire-Stock defaults now in the industry…
Also – In my opinion (and this is really subjective), QSC’s sound so much better than the equivalent Yamaha’s – I did a AB comparison – they were so much warmer sounding at high volumes it was ridiculous. And both blew the RCF’s I also compared out of the water for warmth and quality of sound..
bob6397
October 18, 2015 at 1:52 am #2278061Casey Condo
ParticipantBob – I appreciate the response. I kind of have been thinking to just avoid the ultranet stuff in terms of my decision. I know the QSC speakers seem to be the standard for rental houses, etc. and they seem to be extremely reliable.
I do have concerns that the 8’s wouldn’t be able to keep up with two 15s or a single 18 if the sub was pushed hard. Because of this I am considering a completely different brand. It doesn’t mean I have to go with something different but it is an option since I only own 1 speaker at this point.
If I look at the price difference between:
2 TurboSound IQ12, and 2 Turbro Sound 18s (or 15s they are pretty much the same price) I am at $2,700
OR
2 QSC K12s, and 1 KW181 Subwoofer for $3,000, BUT if I wanted two subs I would be at $4,400.
I wished QSC had other subwoofer options like a single 15″ etc.
I might also consider an EV setup with two 12″ mains, and two 15″ subwoofers, etc.
On another note do you thin two KSUBs would outperform a single KW181?
October 18, 2015 at 7:11 am #2278081DJ Wyld1
ParticipantI have looked at and am considering other brands – EV, JBL, Cerwin Vega, Yamaha, etc.
I currently have a pair of JBL speakers (JRX-112M). Granted these are passive and intended as monitors, but the sound produced by these is harsh in the high range to the point of turning me off from the brand. I would suggest trying to compare speakers in store if possible.
Also, you may want to take a look at the HD Series on Mackie’s website. Here you could consider: 2 HD1221’s and 2 HD1501’s or 2 HD1221’s and 1 HD1801.
October 18, 2015 at 9:49 am #2278141DJ Vintage
ModeratorOn the Mackie HD. A single 1801 is better than two 1501s. I was faced with that choice. Well actually I HAD made my choice to buy two 1501s. Did a side by side comparison between the two and opted to get the 1801 instead. Since budget didn’t stretch at the time, I thought I’d get the 2nd 1801 later. I never did. No need. Actually have it turned down by -3 to -6dB on the sub at most venues because it would bring unbalance to the sound. The best thing is that it does not suffer much from the 18″ ailment, which is that they are usually less tight (or wobbly) at high(er) volumes. These things just keep pumping full rounded low end all the way to the stops (not a place you want to be without earplugs lol).
Ok, guess it’s clear I like my 2x 1221 / 1x 1801 setup LOL.
On the general subject of speaker diameters, a subwoofer is something else than a low range speaker. It’s supposed to play a particular role. Basically the lower the frequency the bigger the diameter and power needed to produce enough air displacement.
So theoretically an 18″ can do lower frequencies than a 15″. Since all kinds of other aspects come into play, building a good subwoofer is way more difficult than building a couple of full range speakers. Just tossing some 18″ drivers in a cube box is not gonna the trick.However, with your intended use I would NOT opt for such a big setup. It’s gonna sit waste space most of the time, takes a lot of handling and a lot of room at smaller parties.
A couple of years ago the smaller portable 2.1 systems started to make headway. Stuff like the LD Systems Dave and the HK Audio Lucas series for example. One 10 or 12 inch low end speaker (not really a sub as it doesn’t go all that low) and two small (like 6″) satellites. Reviews over on the blog on both. They sound way bigger than they look, can fit easily in even a modest bedroom for practice purposes and travel simply in the trunk of any normal car. Amps built in, just a couple of cables and two small stands and you are done. Some come with handy trolley’s built in or custom carrier cases.
In PA the “rule” is pretty much that you get what you pay for. These systems are -relatively- expensive if you look at size and published power and such. But when you hear them play, they WILL surprise you.
This year, at the various shows, the single driver satellites are being replaced by small array type satelittes, which sound even better and have better front/back sound dispersion. Also more brands now selling them.
So, my advice to you would be to look at and mainly LISTEN to some of these units. I think you’ll be pleasantly surprised that you can marry small size do fully acceptable party mode volume levels at high sound quality.
October 18, 2015 at 2:34 pm #2278191bob6397
ParticipantIn terms of 2.1/Line Array systems, the RCF Evox series (8 and now 12) seem very popular and get good reviews – or consider the FBT Vertus range.. With the EVOX 8 (Which has a 12″ Bass driver), the top actually slots into the sub for transport!
Also – I will pass on comparing KSub’s to KW181’s as I haven’t heard the 181’s…
bob6397
October 18, 2015 at 9:17 pm #2278241Elliott Kim
ParticipantGuitar Center now has a 45 day return policy. If you got their Pro Coverage upgraded warranty, you have 60 days. Shouldn’t be a problem returning the speaker. They might be slightly annoyed at first, but if you are upgrading to a pair of K10s or K12s and adding the K181, they’ll go from piss to bliss in a heartbeat. As long as you’re polite, it shouldn’t be a problem swapping out the K8 even if it’s a little past the return period.
That being said, a pair of K8s and a sub will still keep the dance floor rocking. All the K series are rated at an honest 1000W. The only real gotcha is that if you ever want to run without the sub, you’ll need the bigger tops. I worked 2 weddings (150+ guests) with 2x K12 + 1x K Sub. Got lots of compliments on the way the system sounded.
I’ve been really impressed with Behringer’s X series mixers (X32, X Air). Behringer makes me think of Hyundai cars. When they were first introduced in the States and for many years after, they were junk. Now they’re solid as any car, less expensive than comparable models, and even the cool kids are driving them.
October 19, 2015 at 4:55 am #2278301Casey Condo
ParticipantI decided to go to guitR center and a/b the QSC K12 and the ev ekx-12p speakers. I also listened to the ev ekx-18p subwoofer which is roughly the same size as the QSC kw181. Both myself and the guitar center employee thought the Ev mains sounded better. I had to pull the gain down on EV just to avoid the volume change as they have 50% more power but even then they sounded cleaner with better separation especially in the mids and highs.
I also liked the look of the EV speakers better as they didn’t have the screws that held the grills in place visible on the front.
With all of that I still ended up purchasing the QSC speakers. The guy at GC said it is still what he would purchas. He said all of GC only rents out QSC and I know another place here in memphis does the same. Between knowing that and the 6 year warranty is what pushed me towards them. If EV had a 4 or 5 year warranty I would have purchased them instead.
That all being said I hooked up everything tonight and all I can say is wow. The 12s themselves in deep mode have plenty of bass. I have the 181 running by itself off the monitor fader on the mixer so I can turn it up and down separately from the mains. In my theatre room with the 12s in deep mode, some music doesn’t even need the 181.
If you guys were playing in a room small enough where you didn’t need to push any of the speakers real hard would you recommend running the 12s in deep mode and running the sub, run them in normal mode, or run them crossed over?
Also if I am going monitor out into the sub which would be full signal do you guys know if the 181 has a low pass filter already or do I need to ru. It through a crossover first? I also have an Eq I could turn down all the signals over 250hz etc.
October 19, 2015 at 11:26 am #2278421DJ Vintage
ModeratorI’d always leave the lows to the sub. From (enter low range limit) to 75-125Hz (fixed or switchable). The thing is that the lows take so much (amp) energy, that taking that chunk out of the full ranges frees up so much room for mid-lows and mids that the entire sound cleans up. Also if you get an overlap (say 50-100Hz) from sub AND two full ranges, you get an emphasis you don’t need.
Is there any reason for using the monitor out to the sub though? Seperate volume control? I hardly ever hook up my systems like that. If I need to readjust the subs (once in a blue moon), I’ll walk over to them and manually adjust them.
I think QSC works slightly different from other brands. My Mackies for example, the sub has stereo full range input and stereo full range and Low Filter outputs. So I just run stereo to my single sub, then mono’s L and R Low Filter to my tops.
In QSC I think you just link the L and R to the top then sub or the other way around. Set the sub for Deep LF and the top (K12) to LF ext sub.So rather than providing a low filter output, it only has full range on all connections, but the low filter in the K12s will drop anything under (fill in high end frequency limit of the sub).
Personally I’d still hook it up the same way, by running stereo to a single sub and distributing from there. I have special dual-XLR cable reel for the purpose. But again, personal preference.Just me of course. Congrats on your choice.
October 19, 2015 at 5:41 pm #2279271Casey Condo
ParticipantOn the sub on aux out, I wanted to be able to control the output of the sub separately from the volume of the mains so I could control the amount of bass on a per song basis. The sub I found is full range so I now have the Eq on the six only with everything past 250hz all the way down.
I am going to use an RTA later today to see what range everything is playing. The QSC subs also have the ability to do remote gain so I might just get a remote gain switch to control sub output there.
October 19, 2015 at 7:02 pm #2279311DJ Vintage
ModeratorSerious? A sub that plays full range? Odd to say the least.
I can see it has full range inputs, but that is to be expected. It’s most likely that it runs a parallel output to the thru XLR connectors and the rest goes through a summing amp and a low pass filter into the amp. Or so one would think.
October 19, 2015 at 8:37 pm #2279351bob6397
ParticipantWith QSC, the high pass filter is in the tops not in the Sub. The sub has full-range in and a full-range out XLR sockets and they expect you to go from Mixer to Sub to Top as the neatest way of wiring it up…
You put full-range signal into everything and then use the settings on the speakers to get what frequencies you want out of them.
So I would set the Sub to “Deep” and the Tops to “Ext Sub”.
bob6397
October 19, 2015 at 11:22 pm #2279441DJ Vintage
ModeratorExactly what I said earlier, Bob. But there HAS to be a LPF in the sub somewhere, imho. Even though the inputs are full range.
October 20, 2015 at 6:35 pm #2280391Erik Innes
ParticipantI agree with Bob6397 that you should try to “pair up” the speakers and the subwoofers with the same brand. I have an older Yamaha “StagePass 500” PA System, and when it came time to get a subwoofer, I paired up a Yamaha HS8S subwoofer with it (on the Guitar Centre dude’s advice), and it worked out really well. Rocks all the house parties I have held and even worked out OK for small-ish outdoor events. Good luck!
October 21, 2015 at 1:37 am #2280731bob6397
ParticipantWell of course there is a LPF filter in the sub somewhere.. But as you can’t adjust it, I thought it wasn’t worth mentioning.. It’s set at the correct frequency to be used with QSC tops run in Ext Sub mode – where, again, you can’t adjust the frequency..
I know there has to be one, but it is almost irrelevant to the setup as it’s non-adjustable. And the XLR out’s are just pass-through’s anyway.. 🙂
bob6397
October 21, 2015 at 7:48 pm #2281411DJ Vintage
ModeratorYep, it seems the outputs on the tops are thru only as well. So effectively both tops and sub have their own LPFs.
In essence it means it doesn’t matter if you run your cabling controller/top/sub or controller/sub/top. The latter would have my preference is you are using a single sub setup.
-
AuthorPosts
- The forum ‘Digital DJ Gear’ is closed to new topics and replies.