Home 2023 Forums DJing Software Opinions on Mixxx?

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #1013728
    Helge Sverre
    Participant

    I will download it when i get back from work and try it out and let you know what i think.

    #1013772
    Terry_42
    Keymaster

    Nice to play around and you can easily learn to DJ on it, but I think it is far from usable in a live environment.

    #1013814
    DJ-Quantum
    Member

    OK, thanks for the feedback. Because I am the kind of guy who always asks questions, why do you say its unusable in a live environment? Lack of features? Stability issues?

    #1013821
    Groschi
    Participant

    Terry_42, post: 30256, member: 1843 wrote: Nice to play around and you can easily learn to DJ on it, but I think it is far from usable in a live environment.

    I join in with DJ Quantum: What brings you to this conclusion? Had any bad experiences with it?

    I’ve never used anything else since version 1.5.x and it’s always been running ultra-stable on my linux machine.
    It sure lacks some advanced features and as far as i’ve heard the beat/tempo detection (which i have no use for as a rock dj anyway) isn’t the most reliable yet. The latter issue will improve drastically with the next major release, and for the time being they added a tool to manually adjust the beadgrids as a workaround.
    Also, Mixxx in its current state is definitley not the tool of choice for the fans of beatjuggling and advanced button-acrobatics, but with its perfectly useable basic feature set it ticks all the necessary boxes for the more oldschool djs who just want to play great music to their audience.
    You shoudn’t be afraid of maybe editing some configuration files though and it doesn’t wipe your ass for you in some situations, for example when updating to a newer version (you better backup your configuration and database files etc.). I never found this to be much of an obstacle but it might scare away some apple-spoiled beginners who never were confronted with the inner workings of their system (“What the hell is a file system? I just drag that stuff into iTunes and it does everything for me…”).

    *edit*
    I forgot to mention the biggest faux pas of the software: It lacks proper effects, especially a filter. Instead there’s only some flanger stuff that no one has any real use for. I personally don’t need effects, but again, if you need ’em then stay away from mixxx.
    Afaik, theres a LADSPA plugin architecture in the works (LADSPA is kind of the VST-equivalent of the open source world), that should make it easy to implement existing effects libraries in the future.

    #1013909
    Terry_42
    Keymaster

    I have tested it extensively.
    For me the interface was the first point of critique, as it is not where I want it to be. I am not going to discuss the features it lacks, as they state them on their own website quite openly and hence some of them are quite important to me, but may work for you.
    But the most problem I had was things “acting up”. Example, sometimes when I used my mid EQ it sounded like a Phaser/Flanger effect and was totally fine 10sec later and had similar events…

    My observations however are about 6 months old, so they might have fixed several things in that time.

    #1013967
    synthet1c
    Member

    If you know some javascript you can do quite a bit with mixxx in terms of mapping and skinning and there is a lot of work that is being done to get mixxx level with the other programs… The problem is that it is open source so relying on people spending their free time coding it, this means updates take a long time to be rolled out.

    #31080
    djbenno
    Member

    Synthet1c, check your inbox mate?

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • The forum ‘DJing Software’ is closed to new topics and replies.